Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21512611›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2010

Bayesian Random Segmentation Models to Identify Shared Copy Number Aberrations for Array CGH Data.

Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Yuan Ji, Rajesh Talluri, Luis E Nieto-Barajas, Jeffrey S Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. BaySyn: Bayesian Evidence Synthesis for Multi-system Multiomic Integration.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  5. Innovative trial design in precision oncology.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A nonparametric Bayesian basket trial design.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A semiparametric Bayesian model for comparing DNA copy numbers.Brazilian journal of probability and statistics · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing systematic effects of stroke on motorcontrol by using hierarchical function-on-scalar regression.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A Two-Sample Test for Equality of Means in High Dimension.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2015
    Article
  18. Generalized species sampling priors with latent Beta reinforcements.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2014
    Article
  19. Bayesian hierarchical structured variable selection methods with application to MIP studies in breast cancer.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veerabhadran BaladandayuthapaniDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030.
Yuan Ji
Rajesh Talluri
Luis E Nieto-Barajas
Jeffrey S Morris

Funding

Bayesian models for cancer prognosis by integrating diverse types of dataR01CA132897 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JI, YUAN, MUELLER, PETER · 2008 to 2019
$2.1M
Adaptive Methodology for Functional Biomedical DataR01CA107304 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MORRIS, JEFFREY S · 2004 to 2011
$1.7M
National Science Foundation IIS-0914861NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107304NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a high-resolution high-throughput technique for studying the genetic basis of cancer. The resulting data consists of log fluorescence ratios as a function of the genomic DNA location and provides a cytogenetic representation of the relative DNA copy number variation. Analysis of such data typically involves estimation of the underlying copy number state at each location and segmenting regions of DNA with similar copy number states. Most current methods proceed by modeling a single sample/array at a time, and thus fail to borrow strength across multiple samples to infer shared regions of copy number aberrations. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian random segmentation approach for modeling aCGH data that utilizes information across arrays from a common population to yield segments of shared copy number changes. These changes characterize the underlying population and allow us to compare different population aCGH profiles to assess which regions of the genome have differential alterations. Our method, referred to as BDSAcgh (Bayesian Detection of Shared Aberrations in aCGH), is based on a unified Bayesian hierarchical model that allows us to obtain probabilities of alteration states as well as probabilities of differential alteration that correspond to local false discovery rates. We evaluate the operating characteristics of our method via simulations and an application using a lung cancer aCGH data set.

Identifiers

PMID21512611
PMCPMC3079218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.