Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21511092›Full record

ReviewClinics in chest medicine2011

Chronic allograft dysfunction.

Christiane Knoop, Marc Estenne

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in chest medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Cilia dysfunction in lung disease.Annual review of physiology · 2015
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Small airways diseases, excluding asthma and COPD: an overview.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2013
    Article
  6. Early plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-product levels are associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christiane KnoopDepartment of Chest Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. christiane.knoop@erasme.ulb.ac.be
Marc Estenne
Erasmus Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic, progressive, and irreversible loss of lung function is the major medium-term and long-term complication after lung transplantation and the leading cause of death. Over the past decade, progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans. Alloimmune factors and nonalloimmune factors may contribute to its development. Understanding the precise mechanism of each type of chronic allograft dysfunction may open up the field for new preventive and therapeutic interventions. This article reviews major new insights into the clinical aspects, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of chronic allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Indexed as

Lung TransplantationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchiolitis ObliteransChronic DiseaseGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLung DiseasesLymphatic IrradiationMacrolidesNeutrophilsPhotopheresisPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRespiratory Function TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID21511092
PMCPMC7115709
OpenAlexW2020295307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.