Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21511048›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2011

The contribution of the S-phase checkpoint genes MEC1 and SGS1 to genome stability maintenance in Candida albicans.

Melanie Legrand, Christine L Chan, Peter A Jauert, David T Kirkpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeastComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Influence of Genetic Stability onG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie LegrandDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA.
Christine L Chan
Peter A Jauert
David T Kirkpatrick
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

DNA Repair Genes and Acquired Drug Resistance in CandidaR21AI059664 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KIRKPATRICK, DAVID T. · 2004 to 2005
$358k
NIAID NIH HHS 5R21-AI059664NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI059664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome rearrangements, a common feature of Candida albicans isolates, are often associated with the acquisition of antifungal drug resistance. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, perturbations in the S-phase checkpoints result in the same sort of Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements (GCRs) observed in C. albicans. Several proteins are involved in the S. cerevisiae cell cycle checkpoints, including Mec1p, a protein kinase of the PIKK (phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like kinase) family and the central player in the DNA damage checkpoint. Sgs1p, the ortholog of BLM, the Bloom's syndrome gene, is a RecQ-related DNA helicase; cells from BLM patients are characterized by an increase in genome instability. Yeast strains bearing deletions in MEC1 or SGS1 are viable (in contrast to the inviability seen with loss of MEC1 in S. cerevisiae) but the different deletion mutants have significantly different phenotypes. The mec1Δ/Δ colonies have a wild-type colony morphology, while the sgs1Δ/Δ mutants are slow-growing, producing wrinkled colonies with pseudohyphal-like cells. The mec1Δ/Δ mutants are only sensitive to ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS), methylmethane sulfonate (MMS), and hydroxyurea (HU) but the sgs1Δ/Δ mutants exhibit a high sensitivity to all DNA-damaging agents tested. In an assay for chromosome 1 integrity, the mec1Δ/Δ mutants exhibit an increase in genome instability; no change was observed in the sgs1Δ/Δ mutants. Finally, loss of MEC1 does not affect sensitivity to the antifungal drug fluconazole, while loss of SGS1 leads to an increased susceptibility to fluconazole. Neither deletion elevated the level of antifungal drug resistance acquisition.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalGenomic InstabilityAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansFluconazoleFungal ProteinsGene DeletionHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecQ HelicasesS PhaseAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleFungal ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecQ Helicases

Identifiers

PMID21511048
PMCPMC3126902
OpenAlexW2105452043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.