Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21511047›Full record

ReviewFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2011

Milestones in Candida albicans gene manipulation.

Dhanushki P Samaranayake, Steven D Hanes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. SAGA Complex Subunits inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR-Based Genetic Manipulation ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Systems biology of fungal infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dhanushki P SamaranayakeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12208, USA. ds116682@albany.edu
Steven D Hanes

Funding

Yeast Ess1, a Conserved PPlase Essential for MitosisR01GM055108 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI HANES, STEVEN D. · 1997 to 2010
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055108NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM055108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, candidemia is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections and is estimated to cause 10,000 deaths per year. The species Candida albicans is responsible for the majority of these cases. As C. albicans is capable of developing resistance against the currently available drugs, understanding the molecular basis of drug resistance, finding new cellular targets, and further understanding the overall mechanism of C. albicans pathogenesis are important goals. To study this pathogen it is advantageous to manipulate its genome. Numerous strategies of C. albicans gene manipulation have been introduced. This review evaluates a majority of these strategies and should be a helpful guide for researchers to identify gene targeting strategies to suit their requirements.

Indexed as

Candida albicansCandidiasisFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalHumansFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21511047
PMCPMC3143290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.