Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21510857›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2011

Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: a tool whose time has come of age.

Ramona F Swaby, Massimo Cristofanilli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Circulating Tumor Cells: When a Solid Tumor Meets a Fluid Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.Journal of carcinogenesis · 2014
    Review
  15. Circulating tumor cell detection during chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer is not associated with plasma homocysteine levels.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramona F SwabyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. ramona.swaby@fccc.edu
Massimo Cristofanilli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are isolated tumor cells disseminated from the site of disease in metastatic and/or primary cancers, including breast cancer, that can be identified and measured in the peripheral blood of patients. As recent technical advances have rendered it easier to reproducibly and repeatedly sample this population of cells with a high degree of accuracy, these cells represent an attractive surrogate marker of the site of disease. Currently, CTCs are being integrated into clinical trial design as a surrogate for phenotypic and genotypic markers in correlation with development of molecularly targeted therapies. As CTCs play a crucial role in tumor dissemination, translational research is implicating CTCs in several biological processes, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition. In this mini-review, we review CTCs in metastatic breast cancer, and discuss their clinical utility for assessing prognosis and monitoring response to therapy. We will also introduce their utility in pharmacodynamic monitoring for rational selection of molecularly targeted therapies and briefly address how they can help elucidate the biology of cancer metastasis.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomedical ResearchBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicCytological TechniquesDrug MonitoringFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID21510857
PMCPMC3107794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.