Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21509854›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2012

Head direction cells in the postsubiculum do not show replay of prior waking sequences during sleep.

Mark P Brandon, Andrew R Bogaard, Chris M Andrews, Michael E Hasselmo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On the methods for reactivation and replay analysis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. About sleep's role in memory.Physiological reviews · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark P BrandonDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Andrew R Bogaard
Chris M Andrews
Michael E Hasselmo
Boston University · US

Funding

Models of behavior and spike timing in sequence memoryP50MH071702 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI EICHENBAUM, HOWARD B. · 2006 to 2010
$8.8M
NEUROMODULATION AND CORTICAL MEMORY FUNCTIONR01MH060013 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2019
$6.8M
Mechanisms of Entorhinal Cortex FunctionR01MH061492 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2017
$5.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH71702NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH071702NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060013NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061492NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60013NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH61492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During slow-wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, hippocampal place cells in the rat show replay of sequences previously observed during waking. We tested the hypothesis from computational modeling that the temporal structure of REM sleep replay could arise from an interplay of place cells with head direction cells in the postsubiculum. Physiological single-unit recording was performed simultaneously from five or more head direction or place by head direction cells in the postsubiculum during running on a circular track allowing sampling of a full range of head directions, and during sleep periods before and after running on the circular track. Data analysis compared the spiking activity during individual REM periods with waking as in previous analysis procedures for REM sleep. We also used a new procedure comparing groups of similar runs during waking with REM sleep periods. There was no consistent evidence for a statistically significant correlation of the temporal structure of spiking during REM sleep with spiking during waking running periods. Thus, the spiking activity of head direction cells during REM sleep does not show replay of head direction cell activity occurring during a previous waking period of running on the task. In addition, we compared the spiking of postsubiculum neurons during hippocampal sharp wave ripple events. We show that head direction cells are not activated during sharp wave ripples, whereas neurons responsive to place in the postsubiculum show reliable spiking at ripple events.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsHead MovementsHippocampusMaleNeuronsOrientationRatsRats, Long-EvansSleepSleep, REMWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID21509854
PMCPMC3288437
OpenAlexW2041225019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.