ArticleHNO2011
[Traumatic optic nerve neuropathy. Longterm results following microsurgical optic nerve decompression].
Article in HNO, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- [Reconstructive orbital surgery].HNO · 2018Review
- [Orbital traumatology].HNO · 2018Review
- Article
- Predictive value of visual evoked potentials, relative afferent pupillary defect, and orbital fractures in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic optic nerve neuropathy (TON) is defined as injury to the optic nerve with subsequent vision loss due to head or craniocerebral trauma. The treatment of this disease is the subject of controversial discussions. The purpose of the present study was to investigate pre- and immediate postoperative visual acuity in patients with unilateral TON and to compare the results with the time interval between trauma and surgical intervention. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 20 patients with unilateral TON and considerable vision loss were examined. All were treated with high dose corticoids and underwent microsurgical optic nerve decompression. Visual acuity was determined pre- and postoperatively. In long-term follow-up visual acuity was determined 3 months postoperatively.
resultsPostoperatively, nine patients (45%) achieved an improvement in visual acuity of more than 0.4, and another three patients (15%) an improvement of ≥0.2. At 3 months postoperatively another four patients achieved a further improvement of their visual acuity of >0.2. A decrease in visual acuity was not observed in any case, nor were major surgical complications.
conclusionsFactors which predict good prognosis for vision recovery include a short time interval between trauma and intervention, edema, and/or hematoma of the optic nerve sheath. Factors which predict a worse prognosis are a fracture line directly through the nerve canal, a time period between trauma and intervention of more than 24 h, and initial complete amaurosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.