ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2011
The "Non-cuttable" space in between: context, boundaries and their natural fluidity.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liminal design: A conceptual framework and three-step approach for developing technology that delivers transcendence and deeper experiences.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Role Differences in Healthcare: Overcoming Borders through Semiotic Skin is the Basis for Communication.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2019Article
- Once More about Boesch's Ontological Predication in Focus.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2017Article
- Borders, Tensegrity and Development in Dialogue.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2017Review
- Psychological Functions of Semiotic Borders in Sense-Making: Liminality of Narrative Processes.Europe's journal of psychology · 2017Article
- Ernst E. Boesch's Ontologic Predication in Focus.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2016Review
- Culture as a Moving Symbolic Border.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2016Review
- Something Blossoms in Between: Silence-Phenomena as a Bordering Notions in Psychology.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2016Review
- Borders and Modal Articulations. Semiotic Constructs of Sensemaking Processes Enabling a Fecund Dialogue Between Cultural Psychology and Clinical Psychology.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2016Review
- Metaconceptual Frameworks and the Study of Human Infant Category Construction.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2012Article
- Cutting space-cutting body: the nature of the grotesque in umwelt.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inherent open-ended nature of socio-cultural phenomena makes it necessary to create new theoretical frameworks that enable us to understand the fluidity of the relations between different parts of the dynamic system. Recent advance in modern biology seems to provide a set of heuristic concepts useful to investigate the complexity and fluidity of the relationship between different contexts. One of these is the Rayner's logic of natural inclusionality. According whit Rayner's evolutionary standpoint any living system is constantly in dialogue with its natural neighbourhood on the basis of an interdependent and co-evolutive process involved both the context and the organism. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the model proposed by Rayner in light of contextual perspective in development and educational psychology arguing as the space in between is neither a cuttable and divisible presence into discrete things, nor a mere "nothing" that could be cut off our conceptualization. Rather, it's a ground (for a figure) in which flow and counter-flow in a fluid interplay amidst a distinct bounded context takes place.The interest for the boundary conditions calls for focusing on what happened on the border. By adopting a simultaneous perspective from two standpoints we are able to constantly focus on both aspects-what happens inside and outside different social settings-we became aware that the "walls" of the context of our living are much more permeable than has been until now theorized by psychological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21509524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.