Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21509444›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2011

Intensive glucose control and risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.

G Stefansdottir, S Zoungas, J Chalmers, A P Kengne, M J Knol, H G M Leufkens, A Patel, M Woodward, D E Grobbee, M L De Bruin

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00145925 (ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00145925 phase3completednot on this map

ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron - MR Controlled Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George InstituteRan2001 to 2008Enrolled11,140ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsPerindopril-indapamide, Gliclazide MR-based glucose lowering
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Latest insights into the risk of cancer in diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Diabetes, insulin and cancer risk.World journal of diabetes · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

G StefansdottirJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre (UMC), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
S Zoungas
J Chalmers
A P Kengne
M J Knol
H G M Leufkens
A Patel
M Woodward
D E Grobbee
M L De Bruin
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Sydney · AUPharmo Institute · NLThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisType 2 diabetes has been associated with an increased risk of cancer. This study examines the effect of more vs less intensive glucose control on the risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.

methodsAll 11,140 participants from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00145925) were studied. Cancer incidence and cancer mortality was compared in groups randomised to intensive or standard glucose control. Information on events during follow-up was obtained from serious adverse event reports and death certificates. HRs (95% CI) were calculated for all cancers, all solid cancers, cancer deaths and site-specific cancers.

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 5 years, 363 and 337 cancer events were reported in the intensive and standard control groups, respectively (incidence 1.39/100 person-years [PY] and 1.28/100 PY; HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.93-1.26]). The incidences of all solid cancers and cancer deaths were 1.25/100 PY and 0.55/100 PY in the intensive group and 1.15/100 PY and 0.63/100 PY in the standard group (HR 1.09[95% CI 0.93–1.27] for solid cancers, and 0.88 [0.71–1.10] for cancer death) [corrected].Across all the major organ systems studied, no significant differences in the cancer incidences were observed in the intensive and standard control groups. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: More intensive glucose control achieved with a regimen that included greater use of gliclazide, insulin, metformin and other agents, did not affect the risk of cancer events or death in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGliclazideHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMetforminMiddle AgedNeoplasmsBlood GlucoseGliclazideHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetformin

Identifiers

PMID21509444
OpenAlexW2117636763

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.