ArticleHaematologica2011
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is not a risk factor for venous thromboembolism: the Tromso study.
Article in Haematologica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum C-reactive protein increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: a prospective study and meta-analysis of published prospective evidence.European journal of epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- C-reactive protein is a predictor for lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage.European journal of medical research · 2024Observational
- Plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is a biomarker for future venous thromboembolism: Results from discovery and validation studies.Journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- C-reactive protein, immunothrombosis and venous thromboembolism.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Hemostatic factors, inflammatory markers, and risk of incident venous thromboembolism: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021Article
- Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Short-Term Prognosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Can the Level of CRP in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Determine Early Mortality?Turkish thoracic journal · 2021Article
- Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- C-reactive protein and risk of venous thromboembolism: results from a population-based case-crossover study.Haematologica · 2018Article
- The association between red cell distribution width and venous thromboembolism is not explained by myocardial infarction, stroke, or cancer.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Article
- Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and future risk of venous thromboembolism and mortality: the Tromsø Study.Haematologica · 2016Article
- Inflammation markers and incident venous thromboembolism: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2014Article
- Obesity measures and risk of venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction.European journal of epidemiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-sensitivity C-reactive protein is associated with risk of arterial cardiovascular disease but conflicting results have been reported on its role in venous thromboembolic disease. The objective of our study was to investigate the association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and risk of future venous thromboembolism in a prospective cohort recruited from a general population. DESIGN AND
methodsHigh-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured in serum samples from 6,426 men and women, aged 25-84 years, recruited from the Tromsø Study in the period 1994-1995. Incident venous thromboembolism events (n=209) were registered during a median of 12.5 years of follow up. Cox's proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate age- and gender-and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for total venous thromboembolism, and for provoked and unprovoked venous thromboembolism by increasing levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
resultsThere was no increased risk of venous thromboembolism per 1 standard deviation increase in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hazard ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.23) or across quartiles of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P for trend 0.6) in analyses adjusted for age and gender. Further adjustment for body mass index, smoking and diabetes did not alter the risk estimates. Moreover, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was not associated with venous thromboembolism in either gender specific analysis or in separate analyses of provoked and unprovoked venous thromboembolism events.
conclusionsIn this prospective study, serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were not associated with future development of venous thromboembolism. Our findings do not suggest a causal role for C-reactive protein in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.