Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21507586›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2011

Psychometric modeling of cannabis initiation and use and the symptoms of cannabis abuse, dependence and withdrawal in a sample of male and female twins.

Nathan A Gillespie, Kenneth S Kendler, Michael C Neale

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cannabis Epidemiology: A Selective Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Brisbane Longitudinal Twin Study: Pathways to Cannabis Use, Abuse, and Dependence project-current status, preliminary results, and future directions.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2013
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nathan A GillespieDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219-1534, USA. ngillespie@vcu.edu
Kenneth S Kendler
Michael C Neale

Funding

Psychometric and Genetic Assessments of Substance UseR37DA018673 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEALE, MICHAEL CHURTON · 2005 to 2014
$3.7M
TWIN-FAMILY STUDY OF DRUG USE, ABUSE, AND DEPENDENCER01DA011287 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KENDLER, KENNETH SEEDMAN · 1998 to 2007
$2.6M
Psychometric and Genetic Assessments of Substance UseR01DA018673 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEALE, MICHAEL CHURTON · 2004 to 2019
$2.3M
Genetic & environmental pathways to drug use, abuse & dependenceR00DA023549 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GILLESPIE, NATHAN ALEXANDER · 2010 to 2012
$717k
PSYCHIATRIC GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY--NIMH ISAK02MH001458 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEALE, MICHAEL C. · 1997 to 2001
$249k
Genetic & environmental pathways to drug use, abuse & dependenceK99DA023549 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GILLESPIE, NATHAN ALEXANDER · 2008 to 2009
$166k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA-00236NIDA NIH HHS 1K99DA023549-01A2NIDA NIH HHS DA-11287NIDA NIH HHS DA-18673NIDA NIH HHS /DA-49492NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA023549NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA023549NIDA NIH HHS R00DA023549NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011287NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018673NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA018673NIMH NIH HHS MH-01458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite an emerging consensus that the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for cannabis abuse and dependence are best represented by a single underlying liability, it remains unknown if latent class or hybrid models can better explain the data.

methodUsing structured interviews, 7316 adult male and female twins provided complete data on DSM-IV symptoms of cannabis abuse and dependence. Our aim was to derive a parsimonious, best-fitting cannabis use disorder (CUD) phenotype based on DSM-III-R/IV criteria by comparing an array of psychometric models (latent factor analysis, latent class analysis and factor mixture modeling) using full information maximum likelihood ordinal data methods in Mx.

resultsWe found little evidence to support population heterogeneity since neither latent class nor hybrid factor mixture models provided a consistently good fit to the data. When conditioned on initiation and cannabis use, the endorsement patterns of the abuse, dependence and withdrawal criteria were best explained by two latent factors for males and females. The first was a general CUD factor for which genetic effects explained 53-54% of the variance. A less interpretable second factor included a mix of cross-loading dependence and withdrawal symptoms.

conclusionsThis is the first study to compare competing measurement models to derive an empirically determined CUD phenotype. Commensurate with proposed changes to substance use disorders in the DSM-V, our results support an emerging consensus that a single CUD latent factor can more optimally assess the risk or liability underpinning correlated measures of use, abuse, dependence and withdrawal criterion.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAdultCannabisFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSubstance Withdrawal Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID21507586
PMCPMC3172349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.