Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21507479›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2011

Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration.

Joel D Boerckel, Yash M Kolambkar, Kenneth M Dupont, Brent A Uhrig, Edward A Phelps, Hazel Y Stevens, Andrés J García, Robert E Guldberg

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 328 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anatomical implant region - a critical determinant for the osteogenic potency of small extracellular vesicles and rhBMP-2.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel D BoerckelParker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Dr. Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. joel.boerckel@gatech.edu
Yash M Kolambkar
Kenneth M Dupont
Brent A Uhrig
Edward A Phelps
Hazel Y Stevens
Andrés J García
Robert E Guldberg
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
Engineered Delivery of Adult Versus Fetal Stem Cells for Bone RegenerationR01AR056694 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GULDBERG, ROBERT E · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
Vascularization and Bone RepairR01AR051336 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GULDBERG, ROBERT E · 2004 to 2007
$999k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051336NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056694NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery of recombinant proteins is a proven therapeutic strategy to promote endogenous repair mechanisms and tissue regeneration. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has been used to promote spinal fusion and repair of challenging bone defects; however, the current clinically-used carrier, absorbable collagen sponge, requires high doses and has been associated with adverse complications. We evaluated the hypothesis that the relationship between protein dose and regenerative efficacy depends on delivery system. First, we determined the dose-response relationship for rhBMP-2 delivered to 8-mm rat bone defects in a hybrid nanofiber mesh/alginate delivery system at six doses ranging from 0 to 5 μg. Next, we directly compared the hybrid delivery system to the collagen sponge at 0.1 and 1.0 μg. Finally, we compared the in vivo protein release properties of the two delivery methods. In the hybrid delivery system, bone volume, connectivity and mechanical properties increased in a dose-dependent manner to rhBMP-2. Consistent bridging of the defect was observed for doses of 1.0 μg and greater. Compared to collagen sponge delivery at the same 1.0 μg dose, the hybrid system yielded greater connectivity by week 4 and 2.5-fold greater bone volume by week 12. These differences may be explained by the significantly greater protein retention in the hybrid system compared to collagen sponge. This study demonstrates a clear dose-dependent effect of rhBMP-2 delivered using a hybrid nanofiber mesh/alginate delivery system. Furthermore, the effective dose was found to vary with delivery system, demonstrating the importance of biomaterial carrier properties in the delivery of recombinant proteins.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAlginatesAnimalsBone Morphogenetic ProteinsBone RegenerationCollagenDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CarriersIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaterials TestingNanofibersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecombinant ProteinsStress, MechanicalX-Ray MicrotomographyAlginatesBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCollagenDrug CarriersIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21507479
PMCPMC3129848
OpenAlexW2045095867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.