Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21506644›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2011

Natural and synthetic saponin adjuvant QS-21 for vaccines against cancer.

Govind Ragupathi, Jeffrey R Gardner, Philip O Livingston, David Y Gin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Cinderella tree,Plants, people, planet · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Leaf Saponins ofPharmaceutics · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Govind RagupathiLaboratory of Tumor Vaccinology, Melanoma and Sarcoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. ragupatg@mskcc.org
Jeffrey R Gardner
Philip O Livingston
David Y Gin

Funding

SYNTHESIS OF CARBOHYDRATE IMMUNOSTIMULATING AGENTSR01GM058833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI TAN, DEREK S · 1999 to 2013
$5.4M
Novel Adjuvant Discovery in Vaccine TherapyR01AI085622 · NIAID · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DANISHEFSKY, SAMUEL J, LEWIS, JASON S. · 2010 to 2013
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI085622NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most widely used and potent immunological adjuvants is a mixture of soluble triterpene glycosides purified from the soap bark tree (Quillaja saponaria). Despite challenges in production, quality control, stability and toxicity, the QS-21 fraction from this extract has exhibited exceptional adjuvant properties for a range of antigens. It possesses an ability to augment clinically significant antibody and T-cell responses to vaccine antigens against a variety of infectious diseases, degenerative disorders and cancers. The recent synthesis of active molecules of QS-21 has provided a robust method to produce this leading vaccine adjuvant in high purity as well as to produce novel synthetic QS-21 congeners designed to induce increased immune responsiveness and decreased toxicity.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesHumansNeoplasmsQuillajaSaponinsAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer Vaccinessaponin QA-21V1Saponins

Identifiers

PMID21506644
PMCPMC3658151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.