Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21505911›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2011

The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian MS centres.

Berto P, Amato M P, Bellantonio P, Bortolon F, Cavalla P, Florio C, Lugaresi A, Montanari E, Rottoli M, Simone I L and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Detection of clinical relapses in multiple sclerosis cohorts: construction and validation of a model based on administrative data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Berto PPBE Consulting srl, Vicolo Stella 6, 37121 Verona, Italy. patrizia.berto@pbe.it
Amato M P
Bellantonio P
Bortolon F
Cavalla P
Florio C
Lugaresi A
Montanari E
Rottoli M
Simone I L
Zaffaroni M
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant’Antonio Abate di Gallarate · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITCrabbe Consulting · GBFIT Consulting (Italy) · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITOspedale Civile Di Ivrea · ITOspedale San Bortolo · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive disease of the CNS causing disability and neurological symptoms that carry a substantial burden. Previous Italian studies appear outdated, and investigation on the burden of recently marketed drug treatments should provide further economic evidence for policy makers. The objective of the study was to investigate patterns of care, resource consumption and direct medical cost of MS, in the perspective of the public health-care provider. Ten MS experts from public centres extracted and reported data of all MS patients seen during 2009, using a detailed questionnaire. The data of 8,326 MS patients were analysed: the course was relapsing-remitting in 5,376 (62%), secondary progressive in 1,798 (23%) and primary progressive in 691 (9%); 461 (6%) had a clinically isolated syndrome. The EDSS score was 0-3.5 in 5,118 (61%) patients, 4-6.5 in 2,408 (29%) and 7-9.5 in 800 (10%). The average cost of diagnosis (N = 694) was 1,236 €/patient with large variations between centres due to the chosen diagnostic setting. The average direct medical cost for biological disease-modifying drugs (bio-DMD) was 10,444 €/patient/year (cost/patient by primary drug: 9,501 € for interferon (IFN)-beta1a-im; 8,553 € for IFN-beta1b; 11,255 € for IFN-beta1a-sc44; 9,883 € for IFN-beta1a-sc22; 8,174 € for glatiramer acetate (GA); 21,817 € for natalizumab) and 3,151 € for non-bio-DMD. The cost of diagnosis is largely influenced by care setting, due to local health-care provision patterns. The annual medical cost/patient is largely driven by the cost of drugs (89.2% of total); GA represents the least expensive bio-DMD in the Italian health-care setting.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDisability EvaluationHealth ExpendituresHumansItalyMultiple SclerosisSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID21505911
OpenAlexW2045134547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.