Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21505908›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2011

An anatomic comparison of the original versus a modified inside-out transobturator procedure.

Piet Hinoul, Pierre Bonnet, Ladislav Krofta, David Waltregny, Jean de Leval

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Piet HinoulDepartment of Medical Affairs, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, 1, rue Camille Desmoulins-TSA 81002, 92787 Issy Les Moulineaux CEDEX 9, France.
Pierre Bonnet
Ladislav Krofta
David Waltregny
Jean de Leval
University of Liège · BEÚstav pro Péči o Matku a Dítě · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective of this study was to evaluate the modification of a shortened tape and reduced dissection of the inside-out transobturator procedure on the tape's relationship to the relevant anatomical structures.

methodsIn ten fresh frozen cadavers, relevant distances between the two different tapes and anatomical structures were recorded.

resultsThe shorter tape traversed less muscular structures, but consistently traversed the obturator membrane. The median distance from the tape to the obturator canal measured 2.0 versus 1.9 cm, to the anterior obturator nerve 3.0 versus 2.7 cm, and to the posterior obturator nerve 2.2 versus 2.0 cm [modified versus original procedure, respectively (p > 0.05)]. Significantly, less mesh was inserted in the modified procedure on each side of the body (6.1 versus 9.9 cm, p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe shorter, inside-out transobturator tape traverses less muscular structures than its original counterpart, while still consistently anchoring in the obturator membrane at a similarly safe distance from the obturator canal.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAgedCadaverFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvisProsthesis ImplantationUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID21505908
OpenAlexW2029280619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.