ArticleHuman genetics2011
Genetic counselling for personalised medicine.
Article in Human genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic counselors outside of the genetics clinic: Roles, practices, and ethico-legal implications in light of lagging legal recognition across Canada.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Professionals' views on providing personalized recurrence risks for de novo mutations: Implications for genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013Article
- Single cell genomics of the brain: focus on neuronal diversity and neuropsychiatric diseases.Current genomics · 2012Article
- Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues.Journal of community genetics · 2012Article
- "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21505858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.