Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21505834›Full record

ReviewPlant cell reports2011

Two decades of plant-based candidate vaccines: a review of the chimeric protein approaches.

Ruth Elena Soria-Guerra, Leticia Moreno-Fierros, Sergio Rosales-Mendoza

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant cell reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent advances on host plants and expression cassettes' structure and function in plant molecular pharming.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Overview of plant-made vaccine antigens against malaria.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth Elena Soria-GuerraLaboratorio de biofarmacéuticos recombinantes, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Av. Dr. Manuel Nava 6, 78210, San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico.
Leticia Moreno-Fierros
Sergio Rosales-Mendoza
Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic engineering revolutionized the concept of traditional vaccines since subunit vaccines became reality. Additionally, over the past two decades plant-derived antigens have been studied as potential vaccines with several advantages, including low cost and convenient administration. More specifically, genetic fusions allowed the expression of fusion proteins carrying two or more components with the aim to elicit immune responses against different targets, including antigens from distinct pathogens or strains. This review aims to provide an update in the field of the production of plant-based vaccine, focusing on those approaches based on the production of chimeric proteins comprising antigens from human pathogens, emphasizing the case of cholera toxin/E. coli enterotoxin fusions, chimeric viruses like particles approaches as well as the possible use of adjuvant-producing plants as expression hosts. Challenges for the near future in this field are also discussed.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicCholera ToxinEnterotoxinsGenetic EngineeringPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicCholera ToxinEnterotoxinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID21505834
OpenAlexW1989461230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.