ArticleTobacco control2011
Regulating the disposal of cigarette butts as toxic hazardous waste.
Article in Tobacco control, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on cigarette butt management as a hazardous waste and prevalent litter: control and recycling.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Pooled it
- Surface-functionalized cigarette butts as efficient adsorbents for Cr(VI) removal and mechanistic insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The impact of cigarette pack anti-littering messages.Addictive behaviors · 2022Article
- Challenges on the recycling of cigarette butts.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Cigarette waste: Assessment of hazard to the environment and health in Riyadh city.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
- Waterpipe device cleaning practices and disposal of waste associated with waterpipe tobacco smoking in homes in the USA.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- From Plant to Waste: The Long and Diverse Impact Chain Caused by Tobacco Smoking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Global Health Perspectives on Cigarette Butts and the Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Article
- Environmental impacts of tobacco product waste: International and Australian policy responses.Ambio · 2017Review
- Filter presence and tipping paper color influence consumer perceptions of cigarettes.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Perspectives on Tobacco Product Waste: A Survey of Framework Convention Alliance Members' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Article
- Tobacco Product Waste: An Environmental Approach to Reduce Tobacco Consumption.Current environmental health reports · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trillions of cigarette butts generated each year throughout the world pose a significant challenge for disposal regulations, primarily because there are millions of points of disposal, along with the necessity to segregate, collect and dispose of the butts in a safe manner, and cigarette butts are toxic, hazardous waste. There are some hazardous waste laws, such as those covering used tyres and automobile batteries, in which the retailer is responsible for the proper disposal of the waste, but most post-consumer waste disposal is the responsibility of the consumer. Concepts such as extended producer responsibility (EPR) are being used for some post-consumer waste to pass the responsibility and cost for recycling or disposal to the manufacturer of the product. In total, 32 states in the US have passed EPR laws covering auto switches, batteries, carpet, cell phones, electronics, fluorescent lighting, mercury thermostats, paint and pesticide containers, and these could be models for cigarette waste legislation. A broader concept of producer stewardship includes EPR, but adds the consumer and the retailer into the regulation. The State of Maine considered a comprehensive product stewardship law in 2010 that is a much better model than EPR. By using either EPR or the Maine model, the tobacco industry will be required to cover the cost of collecting and disposing of cigarette butt waste. Additional requirements included in the Maine model are needed for consumers and businesses to complete the network that will be necessary to maximise the segregation and collection of cigarette butts to protect the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.