ArticleTobacco control2011
Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs.
Article in Tobacco control, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices.Tobacco control · 2016Pooled it
- Disposal practices of cigarettes and electronic nicotine products among adults, findings from Wave 6 (2021) of the PATH Study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Study of pollution status in urban environment caused by attitude and waste littering behavior of citizens.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Modelling the global economic costs of tobacco product waste.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Article
- The value of studying supply chains for tobacco control.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2021Article
- Article
- Online Simulation Model to Estimate the Total Costs of Tobacco Product Waste in Large U.S. Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Estimating and mapping cigarette butt littering in urban environments: A GIS approach.Environmental research · 2020Article
- Waterpipe device cleaning practices and disposal of waste associated with waterpipe tobacco smoking in homes in the USA.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Global Health Perspectives on Cigarette Butts and the Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Prevention through policy: Urban macroplastic leakages to the marine environment during extreme rainfall events.Marine pollution bulletin · 2017Article
- Environmental impacts of tobacco product waste: International and Australian policy responses.Ambio · 2017Review
- Tobacco industry responsibility for butts: a Model Tobacco Waste Act.Tobacco control · 2017Article
- Filter presence and tipping paper color influence consumer perceptions of cigarettes.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Extended Producer Responsibility and Product Stewardship for Tobacco Product Waste.International journal of waste resources · 2014Article
- Tobacco Product Waste: An Environmental Approach to Reduce Tobacco Consumption.Current environmental health reports · 2014Review
- Cigarette litter: smokers' attitudes and behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGrowing concern over the costs, environmental impact and safety of tobacco product litter (TPL) has prompted states and cities to undertake a variety of policy initiatives, of which litter abatement fees are part. The present work describes a framework and methodology for calculating TPL costs and abatement fees.
methodsAbatement is associated with four categories of costs: (1) mechanical and manual abatement from streets, sidewalks and public places, (2) mechanical and manual abatement from storm water and sewer treatment systems, (3) the costs associated with harm to the ecosystem and harm to industries dependent on clean and healthy ecosystems, and (4) the costs associated with direct harm to human health. The experiences of the City of San Francisco's recently proposed tobacco litter abatement fee serve as a case study.
resultsCity and municipal TPL costs are incurred through manual and mechanical clean-up of surfaces and catchment areas. According to some studies, public litter abatement costs to US cities range from US$3 million to US$16 million. TPL typically comprises between 22% and 36% of all visible litter, implying that total public TPL direct abatement costs range from about US$0.5 million to US$6 million for a city the size of San Francisco. The costs of mitigating the negative externalities of TPL in a city the size of San Francisco can be offset by implementing a fee of approximately US$0.20 per pack.
conclusionsTobacco litter abatement costs to cities can be substantial, even when the costs of potential environmental pollution and tourism effects are excluded. One public policy option to address tobacco litter is levying of fees on cigarettes sold. The methodology described here for calculating TPL costs and abatement fees may be useful to state and local authorities who are considering adoption of this policy initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.