Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21504923›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2011

Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs.

John E Schneider, N Andrew Peterson, Noemi Kiss, Omar Ebeid, Alexis S Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modelling the global economic costs of tobacco product waste.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  6. The value of studying supply chains for tobacco control.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Online Simulation Model to Estimate the Total Costs of Tobacco Product Waste in Large U.S. Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Global Health Perspectives on Cigarette Butts and the Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cigarette litter: smokers' attitudes and behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John E SchneiderHealth Economics, Oxford Outcomes, Inc., 161 Madison Avenue, Suite 205, Morristown, New Jersey 07960, USA. john.schneider@oxfordoutcomes.com
N Andrew Peterson
Noemi Kiss
Omar Ebeid
Alexis S Doyle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGrowing concern over the costs, environmental impact and safety of tobacco product litter (TPL) has prompted states and cities to undertake a variety of policy initiatives, of which litter abatement fees are part. The present work describes a framework and methodology for calculating TPL costs and abatement fees.

methodsAbatement is associated with four categories of costs: (1) mechanical and manual abatement from streets, sidewalks and public places, (2) mechanical and manual abatement from storm water and sewer treatment systems, (3) the costs associated with harm to the ecosystem and harm to industries dependent on clean and healthy ecosystems, and (4) the costs associated with direct harm to human health. The experiences of the City of San Francisco's recently proposed tobacco litter abatement fee serve as a case study.

resultsCity and municipal TPL costs are incurred through manual and mechanical clean-up of surfaces and catchment areas. According to some studies, public litter abatement costs to US cities range from US$3 million to US$16 million. TPL typically comprises between 22% and 36% of all visible litter, implying that total public TPL direct abatement costs range from about US$0.5 million to US$6 million for a city the size of San Francisco. The costs of mitigating the negative externalities of TPL in a city the size of San Francisco can be offset by implementing a fee of approximately US$0.20 per pack.

conclusionsTobacco litter abatement costs to cities can be substantial, even when the costs of potential environmental pollution and tourism effects are excluded. One public policy option to address tobacco litter is levying of fees on cigarettes sold. The methodology described here for calculating TPL costs and abatement fees may be useful to state and local authorities who are considering adoption of this policy initiative.

Indexed as

Fees and ChargesCaliforniaConservation of Natural ResourcesCosts and Cost AnalysisEcosystemEnvironmentEnvironmental PolicyHazardous SubstancesHazardous WasteHumansSmokingWater PollutionHazardous SubstancesHazardous Waste

Identifiers

PMID21504923
PMCPMC3088473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.