Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21504919›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2011

Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste.

Elizabeth A Smith, Thomas E Novotny

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A downstream social norms approach for curtailing e-cigarette waste: Promising social marketing interventions from consumer interactions.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceptions About the Impact of Cigarette Filters on the Environment and Smoking-Related Behaviors.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Impact of cigarette butts on bacterial community structure in soil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Online Simulation Model to Estimate the Total Costs of Tobacco Product Waste in Large U.S. Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. From Plant to Waste: The Long and Diverse Impact Chain Caused by Tobacco Smoking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  15. Global Health Perspectives on Cigarette Butts and the Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cigarette litter: smokers' attitudes and behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A SmithDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Box 0612, San Francisco, California 94143, USA. libby.smith@ucsf.edu
Thomas E Novotny
San Diego State University · USUniversity of San Francisco · US

Funding

The Tobacco Problem:Public Health Implications of Contested FramesR01CA120138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALONE, RUTH E · 2006 to 2016
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA120138NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCigarette filters are made of non-biodegradable cellulose acetate. As much as 766,571 metric tons of butts wind up as litter worldwide per year. Numerous proposals have been made to prevent or mitigate cigarette butt pollution, but none has been effective; cigarette butts are consistently found to be the single most collected item in beach clean-ups and litter surveys.

methodsWe searched the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu) and http://tobaccodocuments.org using a snowball strategy beginning with keywords (eg, 'filter', 'biodegradable', 'butts'). Data from approximately 680 documents, dated 1959-2006, were analysed using an interpretive approach.

resultsThe tobacco industry has feared being held responsible for cigarette litter for more than 20 years. Their efforts to avoid this responsibility included developing biodegradable filters, creating anti-litter campaigns, and distributing portable and permanent ashtrays. They concluded that biodegradable filters would probably encourage littering and would not be marketable, and that smokers were defensive about discarding their tobacco butts and not amenable to anti-litter efforts.

conclusionsTobacco control and environmental advocates should develop partnerships to compel the industry to take financial and practical responsibility for cigarette butt waste.

Indexed as

EnvironmentHazardous WasteSmokingSocial ResponsibilityTobacco IndustryFiltrationHazardous SubstancesHumansResearchHazardous SubstancesHazardous Waste

Identifiers

PMID21504919
PMCPMC3088475
OpenAlexW2159670045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.