Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21504910›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2011

C. elegans: model host and tool for antimicrobial drug discovery.

Jonathan J Ewbank, Olivier Zugasti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beneficial Effects ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacteriophage Therapy forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Antifungal and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Paeonol Treatment Against Biofilms ComprisingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Evaluation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ubiquitin-related processes and innate immunity in C. elegans.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  15. Marine drugs · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Animal Models to Translate Phage Therapy to Human Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan J EwbankCentre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Université de la Méditerranée, Case 906, 13288 Marseille cedex 9, France. ewbank@ciml.univ-mrs.fr
Olivier Zugasti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For almost four decades, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been of great value in many fields of biological research. It is now used extensively in studies of microbial pathogenesis and innate immunity. The worm lacks an adaptive immune system and relies solely on its innate immune defences to cope with pathogen attack. Infectious microbes, many of which are of clinical interest, trigger specific mechanisms of innate immunity, and provoke the expression of antifungal or antibacterial polypeptides. In this review, we highlight some of these families of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and proteins that are candidates for the development of novel antibiotics. In addition, we describe how systems of C. elegans infection provide an increasing number of possibilities for large-scale in vivo screens for the discovery of new antimicrobial drugs. These systems open promising perspectives for innovative human therapies.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryModels, AnimalAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsHumansAnti-Infective AgentsCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21504910
PMCPMC3097103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.