Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21504890›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2011

Jumbled genomes: missing Apicomplexan synteny.

Jeremy D DeBarry, Jessica C Kissinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Massive invasion of organellar DNA drives nuclear genome evolution inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complete Genomes ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Microbial genomics · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Reevaluation of theGenome research · 2021
    Article
  15. Essential Genes of the Parasitic Apicomplexa.Trends in parasitology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jeremy D DeBarryCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, USA. jdebarry@uga.edu
Jessica C Kissinger
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Genome Evolution, Innovation and Adaptation in the ApicomplexaR01AI068908 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI KISSINGER, JESSICA C · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068908NIAID NIH HHS R01AI068908Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome comparisons provide insight into genome evolution by informing on gene repertoires, gene gains/losses, and genome organization. Most of our knowledge about eukaryotic genome evolution is derived from studies of multicellular model organisms. The eukaryotic phylum Apicomplexa contains obligate intracellular protist parasites responsible for a wide range of human and veterinary diseases (e.g., malaria, toxoplasmosis, and theileriosis). We have developed an in silico protein-encoding gene based pipeline to investigate synteny across 12 apicomplexan species from six genera. Genome rearrangement between lineages is extensive. Syntenic regions (conserved gene content and order) are rare between lineages and appear to be totally absent across the phylum, with no group of three genes found on the same chromosome and in the same order within 25 kb up- and downstream of any orthologous genes. Conserved synteny between major lineages is limited to small regions in Plasmodium and Theileria/Babesia species, and within these conserved regions, there are a number of proteins putatively targeted to organelles. The observed overall lack of synteny is surprising considering the divergence times and the apparent absence of transposable elements (TEs) within any of the species examined. TEs are ubiquitous in all other groups of eukaryotes studied to date and have been shown to be involved in genomic rearrangements. It appears that there are different criteria governing genome evolution within the Apicomplexa relative to other well-studied unicellular and multicellular eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeApicomplexaComputer SimulationDNA Transposable ElementsGene DeletionGene RearrangementGenomicsPhylogenySyntenyDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID21504890
PMCPMC3176833
OpenAlexW2076732030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.