Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21504796›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2011

Mapping cortical representations of the rodent forepaw and hindpaw with BOLD fMRI reveals two spatial boundaries.

Artem G Goloshevsky, Carolyn W-H Wu, Stephen J Dodd, Alan P Koretsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional magnetic resonance microscopy at single-cell resolution in Aplysia californica.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Artem G GoloshevskyNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carolyn W-H Wu
Stephen J Dodd
Alan P Koretsky
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

Functional Imaging of The BrainZIANS002989 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI KORETSKY, ALAN · 2009 to 2025
$41.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the rat forepaw and hindpaw was employed to study the spatial distribution of BOLD fMRI. Averaging of multiple fMRI sessions significantly improved the spatial stability of the BOLD signal and enabled quantitative determination of the boundaries of the BOLD fMRI maps. The averaged BOLD fMRI signal was distributed unevenly over the extent of the map and the data at the boundaries could be modeled with major and minor spatial components. Comparison of three-dimensional echo-planar imaging (EPI) fMRI at isotropic 300 μm resolution demonstrated that the border locations of the major spatial component of BOLD signal did not overlap between the forepaw and hindpaw maps. Interestingly, the border positions of the minor BOLD fMRI spatial components extended significantly into neighboring representations. Similar results were found for cerebral blood volume (CBV) weighted fMRI obtained using iron oxide particles, suggesting that the minor spatial components may not be due to vascular mislocalization typically associated with BOLD fMRI. Comparison of the BOLD fMRI maps of the forepaw and hindpaw to histological determination of these representations using cytochrome oxidase (CO) staining demonstrated that the major spatial component of the BOLD fMRI activation maps accurately localizes the borders. Finally, 2-3 weeks following peripheral nerve denervation, cortical reorganization/plasticity at the boundaries of somatosensory limb representations in adult rat brain was studied. Denervation of the hindpaw caused a growth in the major component of forepaw representation into the adjacent border of hindpaw representation, such that fitting to two components no longer led to a better fit as compared to using one major component. The border of the representation after plasticity was the same as the border of its minor component in the absence of any plasticity. It is possible that the minor components represent either vascular effects that extend from the real neuronal representations or the neuronal communication between neighboring regions. Either way the results will be useful for studying mechanisms of plasticity that cause alterations in the boundaries of neuronal representations.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAnimalsCerebral CortexElectric StimulationForelimbHindlimbImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID21504796
PMCPMC4199081
OpenAlexW2050033548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.