Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21504602›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2011

Estimation of alternative splicing isoform frequencies from RNA-Seq data.

Marius Nicolae, Serghei Mangul, Ion I Măndoiu, Alex Zelikovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Handling multi-mapped reads in RNA-seq.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Locality Sensitive Imputation for Single Cell RNA-Seq Data.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Methylome Dynamics of Bovine Gametes andFrontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marius NicolaeDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Connecticut,371 Fairfield Rd,, Unit 2155, Storrs, CT 06269-2155, USA. man09004@engr.uconn.edu.
Serghei Mangul
Ion I Măndoiu
Alex Zelikovsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMassively parallel whole transcriptome sequencing, commonly referred as RNA-Seq, is quickly becoming the technology of choice for gene expression profiling. However, due to the short read length delivered by current sequencing technologies, estimation of expression levels for alternative splicing gene isoforms remains challenging.

resultsIn this paper we present a novel expectation-maximization algorithm for inference of isoform- and gene-specific expression levels from RNA-Seq data. Our algorithm, referred to as IsoEM, is based on disambiguating information provided by the distribution of insert sizes generated during sequencing library preparation, and takes advantage of base quality scores, strand and read pairing information when available. The open source Java implementation of IsoEM is freely available at http://dna.engr.uconn.edu/software/IsoEM/.

conclusionsEmpirical experiments on both synthetic and real RNA-Seq datasets show that IsoEM has scalable running time and outperforms existing methods of isoform and gene expression level estimation. Simulation experiments confirm previous findings that, for a fixed sequencing cost, using reads longer than 25-36 bases does not necessarily lead to better accuracy for estimating expression levels of annotated isoforms and genes.

Identifiers

PMID21504602
PMCPMC3107792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.