ArticleActa orthopaedica2011
Measurement of early bone loss around an uncemented femoral stem.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Periprosthetic bone mineral density, assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, following arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture: 5-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Higher early proximal migration of hemispherical cups with electrochemically applied hydroxyapatite (BoneMaster) on a porous surface compared with porous surface alone: a randomized RSA study with 53 patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2020Trial
- Less periprosthetic bone loss following the anterolateral approach to the hip compared with the direct lateral approach.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Trial
- SPAIRE approach shows equivalent changes in bone mineral density as a conventional approach in femoral neck fracture patients : a sub-group analysis of 49 patients from a randomized controlled trial.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Bone Loss Following Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Peri-prosthetic bone remodeling and change in bone mineral density in the femur after cemented polished tapered stem implantation.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a precise method to study changes in bone mineral density (BMD), including the pattern of bone remodeling around an implant. Results from implant studies are usually presented as changes in BMD as a function of time. The baseline and reference value for such calculations is the first measurement after the operation. The baseline measurement has been performed at different time points in different studies. If there is rapid bone loss immediately after an operation, this will influence the reference value and hence the results. To evaluate DXA as a method, we studied the very early changes by doing 3 DXA measurements within the first 2 weeks after surgery. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe included 23 hips in 23 patients who were operated with an uncemented total hip prosthesis (THP). Each Gruen region was measured with DXA at 1, 5, and 14 days, and 3 and 12 months after the operation. 16 of the patients completed all 5 follow-ups.
resultsThere was no detectable change in BMD in the first 14 days after the operation. In all zones, the lowest BMD was measured after 3 months.
interpretationWe conclude that DXA measurements done within 14 days after the operation can be used as reference measurements for later follow-up studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.