Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21503788›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2011

Growth factor delivery through self-assembling peptide scaffolds.

Rachel E Miller, Paul W Kopesky, Alan J Grodzinsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Self-Assembling Hydrogel Structures for Neural Tissue Repair.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Controlled Angiogenesis in Peptide Nanofiber Composite Hydrogels.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel E MillerDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, NE47-377, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Paul W Kopesky
Alan J Grodzinsky
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Self-Assembling Peptides for Tissue EngineeringR01EB003805 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRODZINSKY, ALAN J. · 2005 to 2009
$6.5M
ELECTROMECHANICS OF CARTILAGE: SYNTHESIS &DEGRADATIIONR01AR033236 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRODZINSKY, ALAN J. · 1986 to 2010
$1.5M
CARTILAGE METABOLIC RESPOSE TO LOADING: TARGET MOLECULESR37AR033236 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRODZINSKY, ALAN J · 1995 to 2004
$1.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR33236NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR033236NIAMS NIH HHS R37 AR033236NIBIB NIH HHS EB003805NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best strategy for delivering growth factors to cells for the purpose of cartilage tissue engineering remains an unmet challenge. Tethering biotinylated insulin-like growth factor-1 (bIGF-1) to the self-assembling peptide scaffold (RADA)(4) effectively delivers bioactive bIGF-1 to cardiac tissue. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether: (1) soluble bIGF-1 could stimulate proteoglycan production by chondrocytes; (2) bIGF-1 could be adsorbed or tethered to the self-assembling peptide scaffold (KLDL)(3); (3) adsorbed or tethered bIGF-1 could stimulate proteoglycan production; and (4) transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) could be adsorbed or tethered and stimulate proteoglycan production by bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs).

methodsChondrocytes or BMSCs were encapsulated in (KLDL)(3). The growth factors were (1) delivered solubly in the medium; (2) adsorbed to (KLDL)(3); or (3) tethered to (KLDL)(3) through biotin-streptavidin bonds. Fluorescently tagged streptavidin was used to determine IGF-1 kinetics; sGAG and DNA content was measured.

resultsSoluble bIGF-1 stimulated comparable sGAG accumulation as soluble IGF-1. Tethering IGF-1 to (KLDL)(3) increased retention of IGF-1 in (KLDL)(3) compared with adsorption, but neither method increased sGAG or DNA accumulation above control. Adsorbing TGF-β1 increased proteoglycan accumulation above control, but tethering did not affect sGAG levels.

conclusionsAlthough TGF-β1 can be effectively delivered by adsorption to (KLDL)(3), IGF-1 cannot. Additionally, although tethering these factors provided long-term sequestration, tethering did not stimulate proteoglycan production. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tethering growth factors to (KLDL)(3) results in long-term delivery, but tethering does not necessarily result in the same bioactivity as soluble delivery, indicating presentation of proteins is vital when considering a delivery strategy.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersTissue ScaffoldsAdsorptionAnimalsBiotinylationBone Marrow CellsCattleCells, CulturedChondrocytesDNAFluorometryGlycosaminoglycansHydrogelsInsulin-Like Growth Factor IKineticsPeptidesDNADrug CarriersGlycosaminoglycansHydrogelsInsulin-Like Growth Factor IPeptidesProteoglycansStreptavidinTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID21503788
PMCPMC3171545
OpenAlexW1972231404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.