Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21503662›Full record

GuidelineDer Urologe. Ausg. A2011

[Follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer patients: interdisciplinary evidence-based recommendations].

M Hartmann, S Krege, R Souchon, M De Santis, S Gillessen, R Cathomas, Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Hodentumore

Abstract readConsensus StatementEnglish AbstractPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Testicular seminoma clinical stage 1: treatment outcome on a routine care level.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M HartmannKlinik für Urologie, Universitätskrankenhaus Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Deutschland. urologe.hartmann@web.de
S Krege
R Souchon
M De Santis
S Gillessen
R Cathomas
Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgruppe Hodentumore

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClear treatment recommendations for patients with testicular cancer exist and their stringent application has led to significant improvements in remission and survival rates. Moreover, active surveillance has become a cornerstone in the management of clinical stage I seminomatous and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. On the other hand, the existing recommendations for the follow-up of testis cancer patients differ widely and have been changed frequently in recent years. MATERIAL AND

methodsFollow-up recommendations in this young patient population have to be as evidence-based as possible, feasible in order to ensure adherence, and should not be harmful. Primarily, attention has to be paid to the negative impact of unnecessary radiation exposure.

resultsRecently, new evidence has become available regarding the relapse pattern of different disease stages of testicular cancer, the use of imaging at follow-up, and the risks of excessive radiation due to imaging, in particular that of CT scans. An interdisciplinary multinational working group consisting of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists has reviewed and discussed the current evidence and on this basis formulated new recommendations for patients with germ cell tumors of the testis.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorEvidence-Based MedicineInterdisciplinary CommunicationAdultChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDiagnostic ImagingFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasm StagingOrchiectomyRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.