Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21502651›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2011

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications.

Veronica Yank, C Vaughan Tuohy, Aaron C Logan, Dena M Bravata, Kristan Staudenmayer, Robin Eisenhut, Vandana Sundaram, Donal McMahon, Ingram Olkin, Kathryn M McDonald and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03251547 (Recombinant Activated Factor VII), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03251547 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Recombinant Activated Factor VII (rFVIIa/ NovoSeven®) in the Management of Massive Bleeding in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2017 to 2017Enrolled76ConditionsMassive Hemorrhage, Massive Blood Loss, Massive Blood Transfusion, ThrombocytopeniaArmsNovoSeven
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Archeology of Corruption in Medicine.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Transfusion strategies in patients with cirrhosis.European journal of haematology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of low- and high-dose recombinant activated factor VII for postcardiac surgical bleeding.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronica YankStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. vyank@stanford.edu
C Vaughan Tuohy
Aaron C Logan
Dena M Bravata
Kristan Staudenmayer
Robin Eisenhut
Vandana Sundaram
Donal McMahon
Ingram Olkin
Kathryn M McDonald
Douglas K Owens
Randall S Stafford
Stanford University · US

Funding

Translating Clinical Decision Making into Systems of Care: A Mid-Career MentorK24HL086703 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STAFFORD, RANDALL SCOTT · 2007 to 2016
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL086703NHLBI NIH HHS K24HL086703PHS HHS 290-02-0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications. PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy. DATA SOURCES: Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: 16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs. LIMITATIONS: The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

conclusionLimited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Indexed as

HospitalsOff-Label UseCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresCause of DeathComparative Effectiveness ResearchFactor VIIaHemorrhageHemostaticsHospital RecordsHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesLiver TransplantationPostoperative HemorrhageProstatectomyResearch DesignRisk FactorsFactor VIIaHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID21502651
PMCPMC4102260
OpenAlexW2142624326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.