Trial reportBMC cancer2011
Correlation of microarray-based breast cancer molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes: implications for treatment optimization.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 225 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
225 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Significance of SIX1 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Survival Outcome in Various Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative study of joint analysis of microarray gene expression data in survival prediction and risk assessment of breast cancer patients.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Evaluation of public cancer datasets and signatures identifies TP53 mutant signatures with robust prognostic and predictive value.BMC cancer · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Tumoral switch in NUMB splicing changes essential transcription pathways and induces malignant properties in tumour cells.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Regulatory patterns of antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis-related genes in triple-negative breast cancer: An integrated multi-omics and single-cell analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based programmed cell death gene signature for prognosis and drug sensitivity in breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- CorePAM: a 24-gene PAM50-derived expression score with cross-platform external validation for breast cancer prognosis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Endothelial-derived PANoptosis factor IL33 is a potential immunotherapy in breast cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Multi-cohort and single-cell profiling of aging genes reveals prognostic and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Multi-omics characterization of cachexia-related genes reveals prognostic signatures and immune landscape in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics uncover RNF130-mediated TNF-α pathway activation and worenine synergy with paclitaxel in breast cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Pivotal Factors in Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Apoptosis Induction by ELF-EMF; Ki-67, ROS Level, HER-2, and SODs.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Age-related aberrant alternative splicing as a prognostic tool in older breast cancer patients.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Expression and prognostic diagnostic significance of RGS gene family in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Integrating bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis to reveal characterization of mechanical stimulus-related genes and prognostic signatures in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Uncovering the Understanding of the Concept of Patient Similarity in Cancer Research and Treatment: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a Hypoxia and Lactate Metabolism Prognostic Score (HLMPS) for breast cancer using machine learning.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimizing treatment through microarray-based molecular subtyping is a promising method to address the problem of heterogeneity in breast cancer; however, current application is restricted to prediction of distant recurrence risk. This study investigated whether breast cancer molecular subtyping according to its global intrinsic biology could be used for treatment customization.
methodsGene expression profiling was conducted on fresh frozen breast cancer tissue collected from 327 patients in conjunction with thoroughly documented clinical data. A method of molecular subtyping based on 783 probe-sets was established and validated. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate molecular subtypes with survival outcome and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Heterogeneity of molecular subtypes within groups sharing the same distant recurrence risk predicted by genes of the Oncotype and MammaPrint predictors was studied.
resultsWe identified six molecular subtypes of breast cancer demonstrating distinctive molecular and clinical characteristics. These six subtypes showed similarities and significant differences from the Perou-Sørlie intrinsic types. Subtype I breast cancer was in concordance with chemosensitive basal-like intrinsic type. Adjuvant chemotherapy of lower intensity with CMF yielded survival outcome similar to those of CAF in this subtype. Subtype IV breast cancer was positive for ER with a full-range expression of HER2, responding poorly to CMF; however, this subtype showed excellent survival when treated with CAF. Reduced expression of a gene associated with methotrexate sensitivity in subtype IV was the likely reason for poor response to methotrexate. All subtype V breast cancer was positive for ER and had excellent long-term survival with hormonal therapy alone following surgery and/or radiation therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not provide any survival benefit in early stages of subtype V patients. Subtype V was consistent with a unique subset of luminal A intrinsic type. When molecular subtypes were correlated with recurrence risk predicted by genes of Oncotype and MammaPrint predictors, a significant degree of heterogeneity within the same risk group was noted. This heterogeneity was distributed over several subtypes, suggesting that patients in the same risk groups require different treatment approaches.
conclusionsOur results indicate that the molecular subtypes established in this study can be utilized for customization of breast cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.