ArticleHuman brain mapping2012
Spatiotemporal brain mapping of spatial attention effects on pattern-reversal ERPs.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Keeping kids engaged: the effects of superimposed single-line cartoons on pattern reversal VEPs.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Early processing of traumatic material and contextual information in posttraumatic stress disorder and its relation to memory impairments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of Inversion and Fixation Location on the Processing of Face and House Stimuli - A Mass Univariate Analysis.Brain topography · 2024Article
- Attentional demands in the visual field modulate audiovisual interactions in the temporal domain.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- An extremely fast neural mechanism to detect emotional visual stimuli: A two-experiment study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Crossmodal visual predictions elicit spatially specific early visual cortex activity but later than real visual stimuli.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Effect of the side of presentation in the visual field on phase-locked and nonphase-locked alpha and gamma responses.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dynamics of the straight-ahead preference in human visual cortex.Brain structure & function · 2020Article
- Modulation of the Earliest Component of the Human VEP by Spatial Attention: An Investigation of Task Demands.Cerebral cortex communications · 2020Article
- No Evidence that Predictions and Attention Modulate the First Feedforward Sweep of Cortical Information Processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2019Article
- Reply to Montemayor and Haladjian.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Detailed spatiotemporal brain mapping of chromatic vision combining high-resolution VEP with fMRI and retinotopy.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Interhemispheric Transfer Time Asymmetry of Visual Information Depends on Eye Dominance: An Electrophysiological Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Attenuation of visual reafferent signals in the parietal cortex during voluntary movement.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Signal Propagation in the Human Visual Pathways: An Effective Connectivity Analysis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Earliest stages of visual cortical processing are not modified by attentional load.Human brain mapping · 2014Article
- Article
- The functional role of the medial motion area V6.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recordings of event-related potentials (ERPs) were combined with structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the timing and localization of stimulus selection processes during visual-spatial attention to pattern-reversing gratings. Pattern reversals were presented in random order to the left and right visual fields at a rapid rate, while subjects attended to the reversals in one field at a time. On separate runs, stimuli were presented in the upper and lower visual quadrants. The earliest ERP component (C1, peaking at around 80 ms), which inverted in polarity for upper versus lower field stimuli and was localized in or near visual area V1, was not modulated by attention. In the latency range 80-250 ms, multiple components were elicited that were increased in amplitude by attention and were colocalized with fMRI activations in specific visual cortical areas. The principal anatomical sources of these attention-sensitive components were localized by fMRI-seeded dipole modeling as follows: P1 (ca. 100 ms-source in motion-sensitive area MT+), C2 (ca. 130 ms-same source as C1), N1a (ca. 145 ms-source in horizontal intraparietal sulcus), N1b (ca. 165 ms-source in fusiform gyrus, area V4/V8), N1c (ca. 180 ms-source in posterior intraparietal sulcus, area V3A), and P2 (ca. 220 ms-multiple sources, including parieto-occipital sulcus, area V6). These results support the hypothesis that spatial attention acts to amplify both feed-forward and feedback signals in multiple visual areas of both the dorsal and ventral streams of processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.