ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2011
Quantification of SPIO nanoparticles in vivo using the finite perturber method.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracking and Quantification of Magnetically Labeled Stem Cells using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Advanced functional materials · 2016Article
- Quantitative contrast-enhanced MRI with superparamagnetic nanoparticles using ultrashort time-to-echo pulse sequences.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2015Article
- In vivo visualization of cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxides by a sub-millisecond gradient echo sequence.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2014Article
- Visualization of the Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO)-Labeled Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Using a 3.0-T MRI-a Pilot Study for Clinical Testing of Neurotransplantation.Translational stroke research · 2012Article
- Image-guided drug delivery in lung cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2012Article
- Essential Elements to Consider for MRI Cell Tracking Studies with Iron Oxide-based Labeling Agents.Journal of basic and clinical medicine · 2012Article
- Improving the magnetic resonance imaging contrast and detection methods with engineered magnetic nanoparticles.Theranostics · 2012Article
- Positive contrast with therapeutic iron nanoparticles at 4.7 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The susceptibility gradients generated by super-paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles make them an ideal contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging. Traditional quantification methods for SPIO nanoparticle-based contrast agents rely on either mapping T₂* values within a region or by modeling the magnetic field inhomogeneities generated by the contrast agent. In this study, a new model-based SPIO quantification method is introduced. The proposed method models magnetic field inhomogeneities by approximating regions containing SPIOs as ensembles of magnetic dipoles, referred to as the finite perturber method. The proposed method was verified using data acquired from a phantom and in vivo mouse models. The phantom consisted of an agar solution with four embedded vials, each vial containing known but different concentrations of SPIO nanoparticles. Gaussian noise was also added to the phantom data to test performance of the proposed method. The in vivo dataset was acquired using five mice, each of which was subcutaneously implanted in the flanks with 1 × 10(5) labeled and 1 × 10(6) unlabeled C6 glioma cells. For the phantom data set, the proposed algorithm was generate accurate estimations of the concentration of SPIOs. For the in vivo dataset, the method was able to give estimations of the concentration within SPIO-labeled tumors that are reasonably close to the known concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.