Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21500196›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2011

Relative input strength rapidly regulates dendritic structure of chick auditory brainstem neurons.

Staci A Sorensen, Edwin W Rubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurodevelopmental role for VGLUT2 in pyramidal neuron plasticity, dendritic refinement, and in spatial learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  4. In vivo reversible regulation of dendritic patterning by afferent input in bipolar auditory neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Staci A SorensenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, Washington 98113, USA.
Edwin W Rubel

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WERNER, LYNNE A. · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
Motley Diversity SupplementR01DC003829 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUBEL, EDWIN W · 1999 to 2014
$6.0M
ONTOGENY OF VERTEBRATE SENSORY PROCESSESR01DC000395 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUBEL, EDWIN W · 1989 to 2004
$1.8M
Regulation /Dendritic Architecture in Nucleus LaminarisF31DC007008 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SORENSEN, STACI A · 2004 to 2005
$64k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC03829NIDCD NIH HHS DC04661NIDCD NIH HHS DC0700NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC007008NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000395NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competition between presynaptic inputs has been suggested to shape dendritic form. This hypothesis can be directly tested on bitufted, auditory neurons in chicken nucleus laminaris (NL). Each NL neuron contains two relatively symmetrical dendritic arbors; the dorsal dendrites receive excitatory glutamatergic input from the ipsilateral ear, and the ventral dendrites receive corresponding input from the contralateral ear. To assess the effect of relative synaptic strength on NL dendrites, we used single-cell electroporation; electrophysiology; and live, two-photon laser scanning microscopy to manipulate both the amount and the balance of synaptic input to the two matching sets of dendrites. With simultaneous activation, both sets of dendrites changed together, either growing or retracting over the imaging period. In contrast, stimulation of only one set of dendrites (either dorsal or ventral) resulted in the unstimulated dendrites losing total dendritic branch length, whereas the stimulated dendrites exhibited a tendency to grow. In this system, balanced input leads to balanced changes in the two sets of dendrites, but imbalanced input results in differential changes. Time-lapse imaging revealed that NL dendrites respond to differential stimulation by first decreasing the size of their unstimulated dendrites and then increasing the size of their stimulated dendrites. This result suggests that the relative activity of presynaptic neurons dynamically controls dendritic structure in NL and that dendritic real estate can rapidly be shifted from inactive inputs to active inputs.

Indexed as

Chick EmbryoAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain StemDendritesNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID21500196
PMCPMC3196591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.