Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21499660›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2009

Evolution of the the ART approach: highlights and achievements.

Jo E Frencken

Registry-linked trialAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04491981 (Longevity of Restoration Repairs Using Composite Resin Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Primary Molars), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04491981 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Longevity of Restoration Repairs Using Composite Resin Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2021 to 2023Enrolled312ConditionsDental Caries, Dental Caries in ChildrenArmsEncapsulated Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite resin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mercury Contamination from Dental Amalgam.Journal of health & pollution · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Two decades of ART: improving on success through further research.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jo E FrenckenDepartment of Global Oral Health, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. j.frencken@dent.umcn.nl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was initiated in the mid-eighties in Tanzania in response to an inappropriately functioning community oral health programme that was based on western health care models and western technology. The approach has evolved to its present standing as an effective minimal intervention approach mainly because the originators anticipated the great potential of ART to alleviate inequality in oral health care, and because they recognised the need to carry out research to investigate its effectiveness and applicability. Twenty-five years later, ART was accepted by the World Health Organisation (1994) and the FDI World Dental Federation (2002). It is included in textbooks on cariology, restorative dentistry and minimal intervention dentistry. It is being systematically introduced into public oral health service systems in a number of low- and middle income countries. Private practitioners use it. Many publications related to aspects of ART have been published and many more will follow. To achieve quality results with ART one has to attend well-conducted and sufficiently long training courses, preferably in combination with other caries preventive strategies. ART should, therefore, not be considered in isolation and must be part of an evidence-based approach to oral health with a strong foundation based on prevention.

Indexed as

Dental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentDental CariesDental ResearchDental Restoration, PermanentDeveloping CountriesGlass Ionomer CementsHealth Services ResearchHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansOral HealthGlass Ionomer Cements

Identifiers

PMID21499660
PMCPMC5467379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.