ArticleNature reviews. Microbiology2011
Fungi as a promising tool for bioremediation of soils contaminated with aromatic amines, a major class of pollutants.
Article in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel approach to enhance methane production in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge via pre-enrichment by a microbial consortium of degrading fungi.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Enzymatic Bioremediation of Organophosphate Compounds-Progress and Remaining Challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Genetic and functional investigation of Zn(2)Cys(6) transcription factors RSE2 and RSE3 in Podospora anserina.Eukaryotic cell · 2014Article
- Biotransformation of Trichoderma spp. and their tolerance to aromatic amines, a major class of pollutants.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- The molecular mechanism of zinc and cadmium stress response in plants.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21499321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.