ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011
Normalizing bead-based microRNA expression data: a measurement error model-based approach.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Improvement in the Precision, Accuracy, and Robustness of Label-free Proteome Quantification by Optimizing Data Manipulation Chains.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Predicting MicroRNA Biomarkers for Cancer Using Phylogenetic Tree and Microarray Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Article
- Challenges for MicroRNA Microarray Data Analysis.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Article
- Hypoxia-regulated microRNAs in human cancer.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2013Review
- Testing for differentially-expressed microRNAs with errors-in-variables nonparametric regression.PloS one · 2012Article
- The effects of error magnitude and bandwidth selection for deconvolution with unknown error distribution.Journal of nonparametric statistics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCompared with complementary DNA (cDNA) or messenger RNA (mRNA) microarray data, microRNA (miRNA) microarray data are harder to normalize due to the facts that the total number of miRNAs is small, and that the majority of miRNAs usually have low expression levels. In bead-based microarrays, the hybridization is completed in several pools. As a result, the number of miRNAs tested in each pool is even smaller, which poses extra difficulty to intrasample normalization and ultimately affects the quality of the final profiles assembled from various pools. In this article, we consider a measurement error model-based method for bead-based microarray intrasample normalization.
resultsIn this study, results from quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays are used as 'gold standards' for validation. The performance of the proposed measurement error model-based method is evaluated via a simulation study and real bead-based miRNA expression data. Simulation results show that the new method performs well to assemble complete profiles from subprofiles from various pools. Compared with two intrasample normalization methods recommended by the manufacturer, the proposed approach produces more robust final complete profiles and results in better agreement with the qRT-PCR results in identifying differentially expressed miRNAs, and hence improves the reproducibility between the two microarray platforms. Meaningful results are obtained by the proposed intrasample normalization method, together with quantile normalization as a subsequent complemental intersample normalization method. AVAILABILITY: Datasets and R package are available at http://gauss.usouthal.edu/publ/beadsme/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.