Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21497707›Full record

ArticleClinical therapeutics2011

Time series evaluation of an intervention to increase statin tablet splitting by general practitioners.

Jennifer M Polinski, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Malcolm Maclure, Blair Marshall, Samuel Ramsden, Colin Dormuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer M PolinskiDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA. jpolinski@partners.org
Sebastian Schneeweiss
Malcolm Maclure
Blair Marshall
Samuel Ramsden
Colin Dormuth
University of Victoria · CABrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH ON AGINGT32AG000158 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GAZIANO, J. MICHAEL · 1988 to 2015
$2.1M
CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG COST SHARING IN THE ELDERLYR01HS010881 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHNEEWEISS, SEBASTIAN G. · 2000 to 2006
$263k
AHRQ HHS 5 R01 HS010881-07AHRQ HHS R01 HS010881CIHR 93539NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTablet splitting, in which a higher-dose tablet is split to get 2 doses, reduces patients' drug costs. Statins can be split safely. General practitioners (GPs) may not direct their patients to split statins because of safety concerns or unawareness of costs. Medical chart inserts provide cost-effective education to physicians.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess whether providing GPs with statin-splitting chart inserts would increase splitting rates, and to identify predictors of splitting.

methodsIn 2005 and 2006, we faxed a statin chart insert to British Columbia GPs with a request for a telephone interview. Consenting GPs were mailed 3 statin chart inserts and interviewed by phone (the intervention). In an interrupted time series, we compared monthly rates of statin-splitting prescriptions among intervention and nonintervention GPs before, during, and after the intervention. In multivariate logistic regressions accounting for patient clustering, predictors of splitting included physician and patient demographics and the specific statin prescribed.

resultsOf 5051 GPs reached, 282 (6%) agreed to the intervention. Before the intervention, GPs' splitting rate was 2.6%; after intervention, GPs' splitting rate was 7.5%. The rate for the nonintervention GPs was 4.4%. Intervention GPs were 1.68 (95% CI, 1.12-2.53) times more likely to prescribe splitting after the intervention than were nonintervention GPs. Other predictors were a patient's female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.18-1.34), lower patient income (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.18-1.34), and a lack of drug insurance (OR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.69-2.04).

conclusionsAn inexpensive intervention was effective in producing a sustained increase in GPs' splitting rate during 22 months of observed follow-up. Expanding statin-splitting education to all GPs might reduce prescription costs for many patients and payors.

Indexed as

Drug CostsDrug PrescriptionsGeneral PractitionersBritish ColumbiaCost SavingsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesTabletsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsTablets

Identifiers

PMID21497707
PMCPMC3080235
OpenAlexW2129352405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.