Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21497084›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2011

Metagenomics and the protein universe.

Adam Godzik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Impact of Metagenomics on Biocatalysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unique function words characterize genomic proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Applications of sequence coevolution in membrane protein biochemistry.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam GodzikProgram on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. adam@sanfordburnham.org

Funding

Structure Determination Core at SSRLU54GM094586 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI LESLEY, SCOTT ALLAN · 2010 to 2014
$40.1M
Development of a comprehensive system for distant homology analysisR01GM087218 · NIGMS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI GODZIK, ADAM · 2009 to 2010
$955k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087218NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics sequencing projects have dramatically increased our knowledge of the protein universe and provided over one-half of currently known protein sequences; they have also introduced a much broader phylogenetic diversity into the protein databases. The full analysis of metagenomic datasets is only beginning, but it has already led to the discovery of thousands of new protein families, likely representing novel functions specific to given environments. At the same time, a deeper analysis of such novel families, including experimental structure determination of some representatives, suggests that most of them represent distant homologs of already characterized protein families, and thus most of the protein diversity present in the new environments are due to functional divergence of the known protein families rather than the emergence of new ones.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsAnimalsDatabases, ProteinHumansProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21497084
PMCPMC3118404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.