ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2010
In vivo target recognition with high-resolution imaging: significance for drug development.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vivo target identification is basic for understanding mechanisms of drug action. Target identification requires cellular resolution. Extrapolation from blood bioavailability, low-resolution scans, radioassays, or in vitro tests regularly produce false-negatives and false-positives. Common ADME procedures disrealize organ complexities. While low-specificity high-capacity sites of deposition are easily recognized, high-specificity low-capacity receptor sites remain hidden. Serious limitations of target recognition are revealed in comparative studies with three methods: high-resolution microscopic autoradiography, radioassay, and whole-body autoradiography. With radioassays and whole-body autoradiography, many targets are simply undetectable. For example, high-resolution microscopic target information for vitamin D, gained 20-30 years ago, was widely ignored. The narrow calcium focus for this multi-target and multi-function hormone was perpetuated until recently through deficient results from conventional assays together with related expert bias. Thus, follow-up has been delayed on discoveries from the use of unconventional histopharmacology methods, pointing at important actions and therapies beyond systemic calcium regulation. High-resolution 'in vivo' target identification with associated functional characterization is useful not only for understanding mechanisms of action, but also for providing leads for innovative and successful drug development and prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21495262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.