ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2011
[Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Indications, techniques, complications and results].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical comparison of postoperative results of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) versus radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation (RF-TVA): a prospective clinical study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2016Trial
- Impact of Aspiration Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Reducing Bone Cement Leakage and Enhancing Distribution-An Ex Vivo Study in Goat Vertebrae.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- [Analgesic interventions for spinal diseases].Der Radiologe · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The indications, technical principals, and results after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are presented in detail. We focus on the complications of both procedures. The benefit of vertebroplasty has been fundamentally questioned by two papers which have recently been published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Our paper discusses the present knowledge and policy about indication. The contradictory results from different studies are presented. In general, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials. Therefore, a final judgement of these two techniques is not possible. New procedures like stent-kyphoplasty or lordoplasty are briefly described. However, at present an assessment of these new techniques is impossible. A similar situation is give for the application of resorbable bone cements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21494814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.