SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2011
Facilitating the implementation of empirically valid interventions in psychosocial oncology and supportive care.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Investigating the Pre-Implementation Facilitators and Barriers of the Implementation of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) Intervention in Canadian Cancer Centers.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- Development of digital self-management support for breast cancer survivors: ensuring evidence-based approaches and patient engagement from concept to implementation.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Implementation of Integrated Proactive Supportive Care Pathways in Oncology: Master Protocol for a Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- End-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: a cross-sectional survey with bereaved family members.BMC health services research · 2024Observational
- Barriers and facilitators for implementation of the SWORD evidence-based psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence in three different healthcare settings.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Evidence-Based Practice in Psychosocial Oncology from the Perspective of Canadian Service Directors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Mapping a decade of interventions to address the supportive care needs of individuals living with or beyond cancer: a scoping review of reviews.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Tools to guide the identification and implementation of care consistent with the psychosocial Standards of care.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2020Article
- Patient and provider perceptions of Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for recent cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018Article
- Article
- Development of an eHealth tool for cancer patients: monitoring psycho-emotional aspects with the Family Resilience (FaRe) Questionnaire.Ecancermedicalscience · 2018Review
- Compassion, connection, community: Preserving traditional core values to meet future challenges in oncology nursing practice.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2018Article
- "An addendum to breast cancer": the triple negative experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Evidence-based psychosocial treatment in the community: considerations for dissemination and implementation.Psycho-oncology · 2016Review
- An eHealth Application in Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: Health Care Professionals' Perspectives.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Development of protocol for the management of cervical cancer symptoms in resource-constrained developing countries.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOver the past two decades, the fields of psychosocial oncology and supportive care have seen clinically effective tools as underutilized despite proven benefits to cancer patients and their families. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the reasons for the failure of psychosocial and supportive care interventions in oncology to realize broad clinical implementation and to demonstrate how a knowledge management framework offers several advantages for increasing the probability of successful implementation.
methodsThis paper is based on a systematic review of the literature pertaining to efforts to implement psychosocial oncology and supportive care interventions.
resultsThe struggle to develop, implement, and evaluate promising psychosocial oncology and supportive care innovations has moved academic thought toward the development of models and theories concerning the best ways to move new knowledge into clinical practice. There are critical and common barriers to the successful transfer and implementation of promising interventions, and implementation efforts may be maximized by using knowledge management frameworks to systematically identify and address these barriers.
conclusionsThe successful implementation of empirically promising interventions requires research networks and practice groups to work together in a concerted, theory-guided effort to identify and address the contextual factors most relevant to any particular intervention. The growing support of knowledge implementation activities by research funders, policy-makers, opinion leaders, and advocates of psychosocial and supportive care interventions is a positive move in this direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21494781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.