Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21494635›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Effect of acute ozone induced airway inflammation on human sympathetic nerve traffic: a randomized, placebo controlled, crossover study.

Jens Tank, Heike Biller, Karsten Heusser, Olaf Holz, André Diedrich, Theodor Framke, Armin Koch, Anika Grosshennig, Wolfgang Koch, Norbert Krug and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01914783 (Experimental Exposure to Air Pollutants and Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Human Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01914783 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Experimental Exposure to Air Pollutants and Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Human Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorHannover Medical SchoolRan2013 to 2015Enrolled30ConditionsCardiovascular MorbidityArmsultrafine particles, ultrafine particles and ozone, clean air
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jens TankInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. tank.jens@mh-hannover.de
Heike Biller
Karsten Heusser
Olaf Holz
André Diedrich
Theodor Framke
Armin Koch
Anika Grosshennig
Wolfgang Koch
Norbert Krug
Jens Jordan
Jens M Hohlfeld
Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine · DEZimmer Biomet (Netherlands) · NLLeibniz University Hannover · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOzone concentrations in ambient air are related to cardiopulmonary perturbations in the aging population. Increased central sympathetic nerve activity induced by local airway inflammation may be one possible mechanism. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo elucidate this issue further, we performed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, including 14 healthy subjects (3 females, age 22-47 years), who underwent a 3 h exposure with intermittent exercise to either ozone (250 ppb) or clean air. Induced sputum was collected 3 h after exposure. Nineteen to 22 hours after exposure, we recorded ECG, finger blood pressure, brachial blood pressure, respiration, cardiac output, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) at rest, during deep breathing, maximum-inspiratory breath hold, and a Valsalva maneuver. While the ozone exposure induced the expected airway inflammation, as indicated by a significant increase in sputum neutrophils, we did not detect a significant estimated treatment effect adjusted for period on cardiovascular measurements. Resting heart rate (clean air: 59±2, ozone 60±2 bpm), blood pressure (clean air: 121±3/71±2 mmHg; ozone: 121±2/71±2 mmHg), cardiac output (clean air: 7.42±0.29 mmHg; ozone: 7.98±0.60 l/min), and plasma norepinephrine levels (clean air: 213±21 pg/ml; ozone: 202±16 pg/ml), were similar on both study days. No difference of resting MSNA was observed between ozone and air exposure (air: 23±2, ozone: 23±2 bursts/min). Maximum MSNA obtained at the end of apnea (air: 44±4, ozone: 48±4 bursts/min) and during the phase II of the Valsalva maneuver (air: 64±5, ozone: 57±6 bursts/min) was similar. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that acute ozone-induced airway inflammation does not increase resting sympathetic nerve traffic in healthy subjects, an observation that is relevant for environmental health. However, we can not exclude that chronic airway inflammation may contribute to sympathetic activation.

Indexed as

AdultBaroreflexBlood PressureCell CountCohort StudiesCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansInhalation ExposureMaleMiddle AgedMusclesOzonePlacebosOzonePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID21494635
PMCPMC3073001
OpenAlexW1985771945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.