Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21494553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

A model of a MAPK•substrate complex in an active conformation: a computational and experimental approach.

Sunbae Lee, Mangalika Warthaka, Chunli Yan, Tamer S Kaoud, Andrea Piserchio, Ranajeet Ghose, Pengyu Ren, Kevin N Dalby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural assembly of the signaling competent ERK2-RSK1 heterodimeric protein kinase complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular basis of MAP kinase regulation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunbae LeeDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Mangalika Warthaka
Chunli Yan
Tamer S Kaoud
Andrea Piserchio
Ranajeet Ghose
Pengyu Ren
Kevin N Dalby
The University of Texas at Austin · USCity College of New York · US

Funding

Mechanism and Specificity of MAP KinasesR01GM059802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI DALBY, KEVIN N · 2001 to 2011
$2.3M
Catalytic Domain Dynamics in Protein KinasesR01GM084278 · NIGMS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI GHOSE, RANAJEET · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Computational Drug Discovery with Polarizable Potential Eneergy FunctionR01GM079686 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI REN, PENGYU · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059802NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM059802NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079686NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms by which MAP kinases recognize and phosphorylate substrates are not completely understood. Efforts to understand the mechanisms have been compromised by the lack of MAPK-substrate structures. While MAPK-substrate docking is well established as a viable mechanism for bringing MAPKs and substrates into close proximity the molecular details of how such docking promotes phosphorylation is an unresolved issue. In the present study computer modeling approaches, with restraints derived from experimentally known interactions, were used to predict how the N-terminus of Ets-1 associates with ERK2. Interestingly, the N-terminus does not contain a consensus-docking site ((R/K)(2-3)-X(2-6)-Φ(A)-X-Φ(B), where Φ is aliphatic hydrophobic) for ERK2. The modeling predicts that the N-terminus of Ets-1 makes important contributions to the stabilization of the complex, but remains largely disordered. The computer-generated model was used to guide mutagenesis experiments, which support the notion that Leu-11 and possibly Ile-13 and Ile-14 of Ets-1 1-138 (Ets) make contributions through binding to the hydrophobic groove of the ERK2 D-recruiting site (DRS). Based on the modeling, a consensus-docking site was introduced through the introduction of an arginine at residue 7, to give the consensus (7)RK-X(2)-Φ(A)-X-Φ(B) (13). This results in a 2-fold increase in k(cat)/K(m) for the phosphorylation of Ets by ERK2. Similarly, the substitution of the N-terminus for two different consensus docking sites derived from Elk-1 and MKK1 also improves k(cat)/K(m) by two-fold compared to Ets. Disruption of the N-terminal docking through deletion of residues 1-23 of Ets results in a 14-fold decrease in k(cat)/K(m), with little apparent change in k(cat). A peptide that binds to the DRS of ERK2 affects K(m), but not k(cat). Our kinetic analysis suggests that the unstructured N-terminus provides 10-fold uniform stabilization of the ground state ERK2•Ets•MgATP complex and intermediates of the enzymatic reaction.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBiocatalysisCatalytic DomainComputational BiologyLigandsMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Molecular Sequence DataMutationPeptidesPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1LigandsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1PeptidesProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1

Identifiers

PMID21494553
PMCPMC3073974
OpenAlexW2107292855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.