Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21493752›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2011

Metabolism and disposition of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy") in baboons after oral administration: comparison with humans reveals marked differences.

Melanie Mueller, Amy K Goodwin, Nancy A Ator, Una D McCann, George A Ricaurte

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine in pregnant baboons (Papio spp.).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie MuellerDepartments of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
Amy K Goodwin
Nancy A Ator
Una D McCann
George A Ricaurte
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of orally administered MDMAR01DA021616 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ATOR, NANCY A. · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
NDMA NEUROTOXICITY--PERMANENT OR TRANSIENTR01DA005707 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RICAURTE, GEORGE A · 1995 to 2005
$1.6M
EVALUATION OF UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS FOR ABUSE POTENTIALN01DA087071 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ATOR, NANCY A · 1998 to 2000
$328k
VENTRAL PALLIDUM DOPAMINE AND COCAINE REWARDF32DA005707 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GONG, WENHE · 1995 to 1997
–
MDMA NEUROTOXICITY IN PRIMATE: PERMANENT OR TRANSIENT?R29DA005707 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RICAURTE, GEORGE A · 1989 to 1993
–
NIDA NIH HHS DA01796401NIDA NIH HHS DA021616NIDA NIH HHS DA05707NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA005707NIDA NIH HHS N01 DA087071NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005707NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The baboon is potentially an attractive animal for modeling 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) effects in humans. Baboons self-administer MDMA, are susceptible to MDMA neurotoxicity, and are suitable for positron emission tomography, the method most often used to probe for MDMA neurotoxicity in humans. Because pharmacokinetic equivalence is a key feature of a good predictive animal model, we compared the pharmacokinetics of MDMA in baboons and humans. Baboons were trained to orally consume MDMA. Then, pharmacokinetic profiles of MDMA and its major metabolites were determined after various oral MDMA doses using the same analytical method recently used to perform similar studies in humans. Results indicate that MDMA pharmacokinetics after oral ingestion differ markedly between baboons and humans. Baboons had little or no MDMA in their plasma but had high plasma concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxymethamphetamine (HHMA), pointing to much more extensive first-pass metabolism of MDMA in baboons than in humans. Other less prominent differences included less O-methylation of HHMA to 4-hydroxy-3-methoxymethamphetamine, greater N-demethylation of MDMA to 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, and a shorter half-life of HHMA in the baboon. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize MDMA metabolism and disposition in the baboon. Differences in MDMA pharmacokinetics between baboons and humans suggest that the baboon may not be ideal for modeling human MDMA exposure. However, the unusually rapid conversion of MDMA to HHMA in the baboon may render this animal uniquely useful for clarifying the relative role of the parent compound (MDMA) versus metabolites (particularly HHMA) in the biological actions of MDMA.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMaleN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePapio hamadryasSpecies SpecificityTissue DistributionN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID21493752
PMCPMC3126644
OpenAlexW2109195750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.