Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21493618›Full record

ArticleThe journal of family planning and reproductive health care2011

Contraception use and unplanned pregnancies among injection drug-using women in St Petersburg, Russia.

Nadia Abdala, Trace Kershaw, Tatiana V Krasnoselskikh, Andrei P Kozlov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of family planning and reproductive health care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia AbdalaYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA. nadia.abdala@yale.edu
Trace Kershaw
Tatiana V Krasnoselskikh
Andrei P Kozlov
City Clinical Oncology Center · RUYale New Haven Health System · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale AITRP Supplement for NicaraguaD43TW001028 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HEIMER, ROBERT · 1998 to 2015
$9.0M
FIC NIH HHS 5D43 TW001028FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001028PHS HHS U01 A147987-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis cross-sectional study estimated the prevalence of contraceptive methods and investigated whether abortion rates influence contraceptive behaviour among injection drug-using (IDU) women in St Petersburg, Russia. METHODOLOGY: A self-administered questionnaire of behaviour in the last 3 months was applied to a convenient sample of IDU women.

resultsOf 80 sexually active participants, 67% had had an abortion. No participant reported using hormonal contraceptives or intrauterine devices (IUDs). The only valid method of contraception used was condoms, which was reported by half of the participants. Consistent condom use was reported by 22% of participants and was no more likely among those who had an abortion. Condom use was significantly associated with having multiple or casual sex partners [prevalence ratio (PR) 1.75, 95% (confidence interval) CI 1.11-2.78, p = 0.01], having an IDU sex partner (PR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.85, p = 0.029) and with a negative attitude toward condoms (PR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.84, p = 0.01). Abortions were less likely among those who had multiple or casual sex partners (PR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97, p = 0.03).

conclusionsDespite the high prevalence of abortions among IDU women, none reported the use of hormonal contraception or IUDs. Having had an abortion was not associated with greater likelihood of using condoms. Participants mostly used condoms with casual or multiple sex partners, suggesting that condoms were used mainly to prevent HIV/sexually transmitted infection transmission and not to prevent pregnancy. Programmes to prevent unwanted pregnancies and reduce abortion-related health risks among this understudied vulnerable group are needed.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorPregnancy, UnplannedSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultCondomsContraceptives, Oral, HormonalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyRussiaSexual BehaviorContraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID21493618
PMCPMC3636722
OpenAlexW2108158430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.