Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21492418›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2011

Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ravi Juluri, George Eckert, Thomas F Imperiale

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05836064 (GastroBot), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05836064 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

GastroBot: a New Artificial Intelligence-developed Software Bot to Improve Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy Quality

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Gastroenterology and Advance EndoscopyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled388ConditionsColonic Polyp, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Disease, Colonic AdenomaArmsGastroBot, Conventional explanation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Achieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  10. Sodium phosphate does not increase risk for acute kidney injury after routine colonoscopy, compared with polyethylene glycol.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy-assisted bowel preparation for colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2013
    Article
  13. Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi JuluriIndiana University Health Physicians, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. rjuluri@iuhealth.org
George Eckert
Thomas F Imperiale
Indiana University Health · USIndiana University School of MedicineRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Using Risk to Tailor Management of Digestive DiseasesK24DK002756 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI IMPERIALE, THOMAS F. · 1999 to 2008
$970k
NIDDK NIH HHS #DK K24 02756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResults of meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing PEG and NaP are inconsistent and have not included trials comparing either or both preps to less traditional ones.

aimTo perform a meta-analysis by treatment arm.

methodsUsing MEDLINE and EMBASE, we identified English-language trials published from 1990 to 2008 that included PEG and/or NaP, and aggregated them by treatment arm into: 4 liter (L) PEG; 2 L PEG; split-dose PEG; two 45 ml doses of NaP +/- adjunctive medication; and NaP tablets. We compared prep quality and the proportion completing the prep.

resultsAmong 71 trials (patient N = 10,201), excellent prep quality was present in 34% (CI, 26-41%) for 4 L PEG alone; 39% (CI, 26-51%) for 2 L PEG; 37% (CI, 28-46%) for split-dose PEG; 42% (CI, 33-51%) for NaP solution; 44% (CI, 38-51%) for NaP with adjunctive meds; and 58% (CI, 49-67%) for NaP tablets. Patients receiving NaP were more likely to complete the prep (97% [CI, 96-98%] vs. 90% [CI, 87-92%] for 4L PEG alone); however, completion rates for 2L PEG (98%) and split dose PEG (95%) were similar to NaP.

conclusionsNaP tablets resulted in better prep quality and higher completion rates compared to other regimens. In comparisons limited by sample size, split dose PEG was not statistically different from NaP solution for completion rate or prep quality.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCatharticsColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePhosphatesPolyethylene GlycolsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCatharticsPhosphatesPolyethylene Glycolssodium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID21492418
PMCPMC3096583
OpenAlexW2143309905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.