Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21492060›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2011

Labeling of mesenchymal stromal cells with iron oxide-poly(L-lactide) nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging: uptake, persistence, effects on cellular function and magnetic resonance imaging properties.

Gerlinde Schmidtke-Schrezenmeier, Markus Urban, Anna Musyanovych, Volker Mailänder, Markus Rojewski, Natalie Fekete, Cedric Menard, Erika Deak, Karin Tarte, Volker Rasche and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. BioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nanoparticles and their potential for application in bone.International journal of nanomedicine · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerlinde Schmidtke-SchrezenmeierDRK Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessia, Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm and Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Markus Urban
Anna Musyanovych
Volker Mailänder
Markus Rojewski
Natalie Fekete
Cedric Menard
Erika Deak
Karin Tarte
Volker Rasche
Katharina Landfester
Hubert Schrezenmeier
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research · DEUniversität Ulm · DEGerman Red Cross · DEImmungenetics (Germany) · DEInserm · FRUniversité de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

aimsMesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are the focus of research in regenerative medicine aiming at the regulatory approval of these cells for specific indications. To cope with the regulatory requirements for somatic cell therapy, novel approaches that do not interfere with the natural behavior of the cells are necessary. In this context in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of labeled MSC could be an appropriate tool. Cell labeling for MRI with a variety of different iron oxide preparations is frequently published. However, most publications lack a comprehensive assessment of the non-interference of the contrast agent with the functionality of the labeled MSC, which is a prerequisite for the validity of cell-tracking via MRI.

methodsWe studied the effects of iron oxide-poly(l-lactide) nanoparticles in MSC with flow cytometry, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), Prussian blue staining, CyQuant® proliferation testing, colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assays, flow chamber adhesion testing, immunologic tests and differentiation tests. Furthermore iron-labeled MSC were studied by MRI in agarose phantoms and Wistar rats.

resultsIt could be demonstrated that MSC show rapid uptake of nanoparticles and long-lasting intracellular persistence in the endosomal compartment. Labeling of the MSC with these particles has no influence on viability, differentiation, clonogenicity, proliferation, adhesion, phenotype and immunosuppressive properties. They show excellent MRI properties in agarose phantoms and after subcutaneous implantation in rats over several weeks.

conclusionsThese particles qualify for studying MSC homing and trafficking via MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsDioxanesEndocytosisEndosomesFeasibility StudiesFerric CompoundsHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNanoparticlesRadiographyRatsRats, WistardilactideDioxanesFerric Compoundsferric oxide

Identifiers

PMID21492060
PMCPMC3172145
OpenAlexW2047945111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.