SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Behavioral interventions for improving condom use for dual protection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Structured and sustained family planning support facilitates effective use of postpartum contraception amongst women living with HIV in South Western Uganda: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of global health · 2021Trial
- Impact of pay for performance on prescribing of long-acting reversible contraception in primary care: an interrupted time series study.PloS one · 2014Trial
- A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms.Contraception · 2012Trial
- Discontinuation and switching of postpartum contraceptive methods over twelve months in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a secondary analysis of the Yam Daabo trial.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2020Article
- Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness and method use among women in Hanoi, Vietnam.Contraception: X · 2019Article
- Assessing the validity and reliability of self-report data on contraception use in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial.Reproductive health · 2018Review
- Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study.Reproductive health · 2017Article
- Provider self-disclosure during contraceptive counseling.Contraception · 2017Article
- Article
- Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians.The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2016Review
- Contraceptive Dynamics in Rural Northern Malawi: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2015Article
- The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2015Article
- A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2014Article
- Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2014Review
- Provider counseling to young women seeking family planning services.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2014Article
- Evaluation of factors associated with noncompliance in users of combined hormonal contraceptive methods: a cross-sectional study: results from the MIA study.BMC women's health · 2013Article
- Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach.American journal of public health · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, hormonal contraceptives are among the most popular reversible contraceptives in current use. Despite their high theoretical effectiveness, typical use results in much lower effectiveness. In large part, this disparity reflects difficulties in adherence to the contraceptive regimen and low rates for long-term continuation.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of ancillary techniques to improve adherence to, and continuation rates of, hormonal methods of contraception. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched computerized databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing client-provider interventions with standard family planning counseling. Sources included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of an intensive counseling technique or client-provider intervention versus routine family planning counseling. Interventions included group motivation; structured, peer, or multi-component counseling; and intensive reminders of appointments or next dosing. Outcome measures were discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, number of missed pills and on-time injections, and pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary author evaluated all titles and abstracts from the searches to determine eligibility. Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. With RevMan, we calculated the odds ratio for all dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference for continuous data. The studies were so different that we did not conduct a meta-analysis. MAIN
resultsWe found eight RCTs; only one showed a statistically significant benefit of the experimental intervention. In that trial, women who received repeated, structured information about the injectable contraceptive depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) were less likely to have discontinued the method by 12 months (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.44) than were women who had routine counseling. The intervention group was also less likely to discontinue due to menstrual disturbances (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.37). In another study, the intervention group was less likely to discontinue due to dissatisfaction with the contraceptive method (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.98), but overall continuation was not affected. AUTHORS'
conclusionsMost studies to date have shown no benefit of strategies to improve adherence and continuation. These trials have important limitations, however. Three had small sample sizes, four had high losses to follow up, and the intervention and its intensity varied across the studies. High-quality research is a priority, since adherence and continuation are fundamentally important to the successful use of hormonal contraceptives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.