Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21490964›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Relief as a reward: hedonic and neural responses to safety from pain.

Siri Leknes, Michael Lee, Chantal Berna, Jesper Andersson, Irene Tracey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04685018 (The Neurocircuitry of Relief During Avoidance Learning in Patients With Obsessive-compulsive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04685018 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Neurocircuitry of Relief During Avoidance Learning in Patients With Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

TypeobservationalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2020 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsObsessive-Compulsive DisorderArmsfMRI acquisition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Placebo improves pleasure and pain through opposite modulation of sensory processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Counterfactual relief.Memory & cognition · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. State- and Circuit-Dependent Opponent Processing of Fear.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Safety signals reinforce instrumental avoidance in humans.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Brain representations of affective valence and intensity in sustained pleasure and pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siri LeknesNuffield Division of Anaesthetics, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Siri.leknes@psykologi.uio.no
Michael Lee
Chantal Berna
Jesper Andersson
Irene Tracey
University of Oxford · GBWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601340Medical Research Council G0700399Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relief fits the definition of a reward. Unlike other reward types the pleasantness of relief depends on the violation of a negative expectation, yet this has not been investigated using neuroimaging approaches. We hypothesized that the degree of negative expectation depends on state (dread) and trait (pessimism) sensitivity. Of the brain regions that are involved in mediating pleasure, the nucleus accumbens also signals unexpected reward and positive prediction error. We hypothesized that accumbens activity reflects the level of negative expectation and subsequent pleasant relief. Using fMRI and two purpose-made tasks, we compared hedonic and BOLD responses to relief with responses during an appetitive reward task in 18 healthy volunteers. We expected some similarities in task responses, reflecting common neural substrates implicated across reward types. However, we also hypothesized that relief responses would differ from appetitive rewards in the nucleus accumbens, since only relief pleasantness depends on negative expectations. The results confirmed these hypotheses. Relief and appetitive reward task activity converged in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which also correlated with appetitive reward pleasantness ratings. In contrast, dread and pessimism scores correlated with relief but not with appetitive reward hedonics. Moreover, only relief pleasantness covaried with accumbens activation. Importantly, the accumbens signal appeared to specifically reflect individual differences in anticipation of the adverse event (dread, pessimism) but was uncorrelated to appetitive reward hedonics. In conclusion, relief differs from appetitive rewards due to its reliance on negative expectations, the violation of which is reflected in relief-related accumbens activation.

Indexed as

RewardAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNucleus AccumbensPainYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21490964
PMCPMC3072382
OpenAlexW2090936348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.