ArticleGene therapy2011
Investigation of the peak action wavelength of light-activated gene transduction.
Article in Gene therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light-activated gene transduction (LAGT) is an approach to localize gene therapy via preactivation of cells with UV light, which facilitates transduction by recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors. Previous studies demonstrated that UVC induces LAGT secondary to pyrimidine dimer formation, whereas UVA induces LAGT secondary to reactive-oxygen species (ROS) generation. However, the empirical UVB boundary of these UV effects is unknown. Thus, we aimed to define the action spectra for UV-induced LAGT independent of DNA damage and determine an optimal wavelength to maximize safety and efficacy. UV at 288, 311 and 320 nm produced significant dose-dependent LAGT effects, of which the maximum (800-fold) was observed with 4 kJ m⁻² at 311 nm. Consistent with its robust cytotoxicity, 288 nm produced significantly high levels of DNA damage at all doses tested, whereas 311, 320 and 330 nm did not generate pyrimidine dimers and produced low levels of DNA damage detected by comet assay. Although 288 nm failed to induce ROS, the other wavelengths were effective, with the maximum (10-fold) effect observed with 30 kJ m⁻² at 311 nm. An in vivo pilot study assessing 311 nm-induced LAGT of rabbit articular chondrocytes demonstrated a significant 6.6-fold (P<0.05) increase in transduction with insignificant cytotoxicity. In conclusion, 311 nm was found to be the optimal wavelength for LAGT on the basis of its superior efficacy at the peak dose and its broad safety range that is remarkably wider than the other UV wavelengths tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.