Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21489668›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2011

Predicting mortality in incident dialysis patients: an analysis of the United Kingdom Renal Registry.

Martin Wagner, David Ansell, David M Kent, John L Griffith, David Naimark, Christoph Wanner, Navdeep Tangri

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Risk Factors for Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Designing an Implementable Clinical Prediction Model for Near-Term Mortality and Long-Term Survival in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin WagnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. wagner_m@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
David Ansell
David M Kent
John L Griffith
David Naimark
Christoph Wanner
Navdeep Tangri

Funding

TUFTS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATION SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025752 · NCRR · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2008 to 2011
$17.6M
CIHRNCRR NIH HHS 1UL1 RR025752NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of death in dialysis patients is high, but varies significantly among patients. No prediction tool is used widely in current clinical practice. We aimed to predict long-term mortality in incident dialysis patients using easily obtainable variables. STUDY

designProspective nationwide multicenter cohort study in the United Kingdom (UK Renal Registry); models were developed using Cox proportional hazards. SETTING &

participantsPatients initiating hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis therapy in 2002-2004 who survived at least 3 months on dialysis treatment were followed up for 3 years. Analyses were restricted to participants for whom information for comorbid conditions and laboratory measurements were available (n = 5,447). The data set was divided into data sets for model development (n = 3,631; training) and validation (n = 1,816) using random selection. PREDICTORS: Basic patient characteristics, comorbid conditions, and laboratory variables. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality censored for kidney transplant, recovery of kidney function, and loss to follow-up.

resultsIn the training data set, 1,078 patients (29.7%) died within the observation period. The final model for the training data set included patient characteristics (age, race, primary kidney disease, and treatment modality), comorbid conditions (diabetes, history of cardiovascular disease, and smoking), and laboratory variables (hemoglobin, serum albumin, creatinine, and calcium levels); reached a C statistic of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.77); and could discriminate accurately among patients with low (6%), intermediate (19%), high (33%), and very high (59%) mortality risk. The model was applied further to the validation data set and achieved a C statistic of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.76). LIMITATIONS: Number of missing comorbidity data and lack of an external validation data set.

conclusionsBasic patient characteristics, comorbid conditions, and laboratory variables can predict 3-year mortality in incident dialysis patients with sufficient accuracy. Identification of subgroups of patients according to mortality risk can guide future research and subsequently target treatment decisions in individual patients.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedCause of DeathFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21489668
PMCPMC3100445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.